Thursday, September 17, 2009

Training Them Not to Get Caught

From the NY Post:
ALBANY -- Threatened with a national freeze on the taxpayer dollars that fund it, the embattled activist group ACORN announced yesterday it was turning over a new leaf.

National ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis abruptly suspended housing programs exposed in a series of undercover video stings in recent days and ordered emergency training sessions for all frontline workers.
Ms. Lewis of course hasn't ordered training sessions, ACORN employees are already superbly trained--note in those videos their facility with tax rules and forms and how to cheat on them. Rather, she has likely ordered retraining sessions, possibly along these lines: "Never offer aid to thugs unless you are sure they are real thugs; at the very least run a criminal background check."

Like all radical left organizations, ACORN believes the ends justify the means and Friedrich A. Hayek had the take on that long before ACORN even existed (from The Road to Serfdom):
Advancement within a totalitarian group or party depends largely on a willingness to do immoral things. The principle that the end justifies the means, which in individualist ethics is regarded as the denial of all morals, in collectivist ethics becomes necessarily the supreme rule. There is literally nothing which the consistent collectivist must not be prepared to do if it serves "the good of the whole," because that is to him the only criterion of what ought to be done.
Let us also not forget what former New York Mayor Koch said of so-called "first offenders:" "A first offender is in reality usually a multiple offender who is being caught for the first time." ACORN will be in the news again soon enough (but not, of course, in the New York Times).

Training Them Not to Get Caught

From the NY Post:
ALBANY -- Threatened with a national freeze on the taxpayer dollars that fund it, the embattled activist group ACORN announced yesterday it was turning over a new leaf.

National ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis abruptly suspended housing programs exposed in a series of undercover video stings in recent days and ordered emergency training sessions for all frontline workers.
Ms. Lewis of course hasn't ordered training sessions, ACORN employees are already superbly trained--note in those videos their facility with tax rules and forms and how to cheat on them. Rather, she has likely ordered retraining sessions, possibly along these lines: "Never offer aid to thugs unless you are sure they are real thugs; at the very least run a criminal background check."

Like all radical left organizations, ACORN believes the ends justify the means and Friedrich A. Hayek had the take on that long before ACORN even existed (from The Road to Serfdom):
Advancement within a totalitarian group or party depends largely on a willingness to do immoral things. The principle that the end justifies the means, which in individualist ethics is regarded as the denial of all morals, in collectivist ethics becomes necessarily the supreme rule. There is literally nothing which the consistent collectivist must not be prepared to do if it serves "the good of the whole," because that is to him the only criterion of what ought to be done.
Let us also not forget what former New York Mayor Koch said of so-called "first offenders:" "A first offender is in reality usually a multiple offender who is being caught for the first time." ACORN will be in the news again soon enough (but not, of course, in the New York Times).

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Those Terrible Irreverent Thoughts...

This one today while returning to my pew after communion, the host stuck to the roof of my mouth: "Jesus, you get down from there right now!"

Miserere mei, Deus.

Those Terrible Irreverent Thoughts...

This one today while returning to my pew after communion, the host stuck to the roof of my mouth: "Jesus, you get down from there right now!"

Miserere mei, Deus.

Breaking News: There are Adults in England

But only among the children: the grown-ups are as childish as ever.

LONDON (Reuters) - A group of schoolchildren who reared a lamb from birth and named it Marcus has overridden objections by parents and rights activists and voted to send the animal to slaughter.

Marcus the six-month-old lamb has now been culled, the head teacher of the primary school in Kent confirmed on Monday, after the school's council -- a 14-member group of children aged 6 to 11 -- voted 13-1 to have him killed.

The decision has provoked fury among animal-loving celebrities, animal and human rights campaigners and the parents of some of the children, and led to threats against Lydd primary school and its teachers, according to a member of staff.
[Snip]
[O]pponents branded it heartless and cruel, with animal rights campaigners asking why Marcus could not have been used to teach the children about wool, and human rights campaigners worried about the emotional impact of Marcus's death on the children.
The human (sic) rights campaigners should worry more about the emotional impact on themselves.
"When we started the farm in spring 2009, the aim was to educate the children in all aspects of farming life and everything that implies," the school said in a statement.

"The children have had a range of opportunities to discuss this issue, both in terms of the food cycle and the ethical aspect...
In other words, they acted like adults. The kids should have named the critter "Cheney" or "Thatcher." The human rights campaigners and celebrities would be scrambling to cut its throat.

(h/t New Advent.)

Breaking News: There are Adults in England

But only among the children: the grown-ups are as childish as ever.

LONDON (Reuters) - A group of schoolchildren who reared a lamb from birth and named it Marcus has overridden objections by parents and rights activists and voted to send the animal to slaughter.

Marcus the six-month-old lamb has now been culled, the head teacher of the primary school in Kent confirmed on Monday, after the school's council -- a 14-member group of children aged 6 to 11 -- voted 13-1 to have him killed.

The decision has provoked fury among animal-loving celebrities, animal and human rights campaigners and the parents of some of the children, and led to threats against Lydd primary school and its teachers, according to a member of staff.
[Snip]
[O]pponents branded it heartless and cruel, with animal rights campaigners asking why Marcus could not have been used to teach the children about wool, and human rights campaigners worried about the emotional impact of Marcus's death on the children.
The human (sic) rights campaigners should worry more about the emotional impact on themselves.
"When we started the farm in spring 2009, the aim was to educate the children in all aspects of farming life and everything that implies," the school said in a statement.

"The children have had a range of opportunities to discuss this issue, both in terms of the food cycle and the ethical aspect...
In other words, they acted like adults. The kids should have named the critter "Cheney" or "Thatcher." The human rights campaigners and celebrities would be scrambling to cut its throat.

(h/t New Advent.)

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

This is Kind of Exciting

From the NCRegister:
The Catholic Archbishop of Moscow has given a remarkably upbeat assessment of relations with the Orthodox Church, saying unity between Catholics and Orthodox could be achieved “within a few months.”

In an interview today in Italy’s Corriere della Sera newspaper, Archbishop Paolo Pezzi said the miracle of reunification “is possible, indeed it has never been so close.” The archbishop added that Catholic-Orthodox reunification, the end of the historic schism that has divided them for a millennium, and spiritual communion between the two churches “could happen soon, within a few months.”
As I wrote above, this is kind of exciting. If I seem a tad reserved over this potentially spectacular news, it's only because I have heard or read reports in the past of a similar nature, only to be disappointed later when they came to naught; indeed I detect a big fly in the ointment in this report of east-west reunification:
[O]n matters of doctrine, the two churches are essentially in agreement. “There remains the question of papal primacy,” Archbishop Pezzi acknowledged, “and this will be a concern at the next meeting of the Catholic-Orthodox Commission. But to me, it doesn’t seem impossible to reach an agreement.”
I admire Archbishop Pezzi's optimism but realistically, papal primacy is a pretty big bugaboo for eastern Christians so I am not so sanguine it can be resolved that easily. Still, anything is possible with God's help so let us all pray for those taking part in the next meeting of the Catholic-Orthodox Commission. Truly their task is a godly one and if they are sucessful it could be the dawning of a new (dare I say exciting?) age for Holy Church.

This is Kind of Exciting

From the NCRegister:
The Catholic Archbishop of Moscow has given a remarkably upbeat assessment of relations with the Orthodox Church, saying unity between Catholics and Orthodox could be achieved “within a few months.”

In an interview today in Italy’s Corriere della Sera newspaper, Archbishop Paolo Pezzi said the miracle of reunification “is possible, indeed it has never been so close.” The archbishop added that Catholic-Orthodox reunification, the end of the historic schism that has divided them for a millennium, and spiritual communion between the two churches “could happen soon, within a few months.”
As I wrote above, this is kind of exciting. If I seem a tad reserved over this potentially spectacular news, it's only because I have heard or read reports in the past of a similar nature, only to be disappointed later when they came to naught; indeed I detect a big fly in the ointment in this report of east-west reunification:
[O]n matters of doctrine, the two churches are essentially in agreement. “There remains the question of papal primacy,” Archbishop Pezzi acknowledged, “and this will be a concern at the next meeting of the Catholic-Orthodox Commission. But to me, it doesn’t seem impossible to reach an agreement.”
I admire Archbishop Pezzi's optimism but realistically, papal primacy is a pretty big bugaboo for eastern Christians so I am not so sanguine it can be resolved that easily. Still, anything is possible with God's help so let us all pray for those taking part in the next meeting of the Catholic-Orthodox Commission. Truly their task is a godly one and if they are sucessful it could be the dawning of a new (dare I say exciting?) age for Holy Church.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Department of Things I Wish I had Said

Kyle Smith, in the New York Post, on the Van Jones farrago and the New York Times:
The Times was aware of the story, knew it was bigger than most of the stuff it puts in the paper every day, and had plenty of resources to cover it.

But The Times purposely ignored it because it was hoping that the story would go away, because it likes people like Comrade Jones and was hoping he wouldn’t be forced out. The Times doesn’t like people like Glenn Beck and didn’t want him to be able to claim Jones’s scalp. The Times’ prejudice blinded it to the fact that Jones’ fall became obvious on Friday, when a White House spokesman refused to defend him.

Newspaper of record? The Times isn’t so much a newspaper as a clique of high school girls sending IMs to like-minded friends about their feuds and faves and raves and rants. OMFG you guys! It’s no more objective than Beck is.
Nope, and a lot less entertaining. When a newspaper culls its stories with such keen regard for editor and reader sensibilities it can no longer be considered a serious news source. Meanwhile, the Times' circulation continues to "plummet."

Department of Things I Wish I had Said

Kyle Smith, in the New York Post, on the Van Jones farrago and the New York Times:
The Times was aware of the story, knew it was bigger than most of the stuff it puts in the paper every day, and had plenty of resources to cover it.

But The Times purposely ignored it because it was hoping that the story would go away, because it likes people like Comrade Jones and was hoping he wouldn’t be forced out. The Times doesn’t like people like Glenn Beck and didn’t want him to be able to claim Jones’s scalp. The Times’ prejudice blinded it to the fact that Jones’ fall became obvious on Friday, when a White House spokesman refused to defend him.

Newspaper of record? The Times isn’t so much a newspaper as a clique of high school girls sending IMs to like-minded friends about their feuds and faves and raves and rants. OMFG you guys! It’s no more objective than Beck is.
Nope, and a lot less entertaining. When a newspaper culls its stories with such keen regard for editor and reader sensibilities it can no longer be considered a serious news source. Meanwhile, the Times' circulation continues to "plummet."

Old Habits are Hard to Break

Gateway Pundit has posted pics that contrast the condition yesterday's Tea Party demonstraters left Washington in with that of the celebrators of the President's inauguration.

Here, post Tea Party:



Here, post-Obama inauguration:



Quite a contrast and here in the same vein another pic: from Life Magazine 40 years ago taken after the Woodstock Festival in Bethel, New York when the celebrators of "3 Days of Peace & Music" thankfully went home.


It's the Woodstock Generation tradition that continues to this day: leaving a mess for someone else to clean up.

Old Habits are Hard to Break

Gateway Pundit has posted pics that contrast the condition yesterday's Tea Party demonstraters left Washington in with that of the celebrators of the President's inauguration.

Here, post Tea Party:



Here, post-Obama inauguration:



Quite a contrast and here in the same vein another pic: from Life Magazine 40 years ago taken after the Woodstock Festival in Bethel, New York when the celebrators of "3 Days of Peace & Music" thankfully went home.


It's the Woodstock Generation tradition that continues to this day: leaving a mess for someone else to clean up.

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Catholic, Schmatholic

The homily given by the priest this morning at...well, let's call it Old Ivy Catholic Church in upper Manhattan...was on the Gospel reading from Mark 8:27-35 (links are to the King James Version--still my favorite). The priest pointed out the similarity of this passage to that in Matthew 16:13-25 save for the lack of the well known words of Peter's investiture: "Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church." He then offered some explanations by New Testament scholars why this is not found in Mark's Gospel, none of them being the least bit persuasive.

I wasn't bothered by that, I long ago came to expect idiocies from New Testament scholars; so many of whom not beliveing in God and whose sole aim is proving Jesus didn't (and doesn't) exist. What was bothersome however was the priest instructing us while the Catholic Church continually uses that passage from Matthew to proclaim her dominion over all other branches of Christianity, it is wrong to interpret it that way; that our Lord was more concerned with Christianity than the Catholic Church. Well then, if that is the case I guess the two years of prayers, agonized arguments with myself, consultations with friends and priests, the eight months of catechism and the eventual conclusion reached that Holy Church is indeed the one true Church and the way to salvation was an utter waste of time; I might as well have stayed with the Episcopalians.

I was tempted after mass to ask the priest if he really meant what he said, did that mean people like me who converted to Catholicism did so only for the magnificent post-Vatican II liturgy and music? Happily, I restrained myself. He's a nice enough fellow otherwise, getting on in years and will retire soon enough I suppose, although it is tempting also to suppose not soon enough.

Catholic, Schmatholic

The homily given by the priest this morning at...well, let's call it Old Ivy Catholic Church in upper Manhattan...was on the Gospel reading from Mark 8:27-35 (links are to the King James Version--still my favorite). The priest pointed out the similarity of this passage to that in Matthew 16:13-25 save for the lack of the well known words of Peter's investiture: "Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church." He then offered some explanations by New Testament scholars why this is not found in Mark's Gospel, none of them being the least bit persuasive.

I wasn't bothered by that, I long ago came to expect idiocies from New Testament scholars; so many of whom not beliveing in God and whose sole aim is proving Jesus didn't (and doesn't) exist. What was bothersome however was the priest instructing us while the Catholic Church continually uses that passage from Matthew to proclaim her dominion over all other branches of Christianity, it is wrong to interpret it that way; that our Lord was more concerned with Christianity than the Catholic Church. Well then, if that is the case I guess the two years of prayers, agonized arguments with myself, consultations with friends and priests, the eight months of catechism and the eventual conclusion reached that Holy Church is indeed the one true Church and the way to salvation was an utter waste of time; I might as well have stayed with the Episcopalians.

I was tempted after mass to ask the priest if he really meant what he said, did that mean people like me who converted to Catholicism did so only for the magnificent post-Vatican II liturgy and music? Happily, I restrained myself. He's a nice enough fellow otherwise, getting on in years and will retire soon enough I suppose, although it is tempting also to suppose not soon enough.

They're Not Who They'll Say They Are

As the Tea Party/Don't Tread on Me revolt grows we can count on the media churning out dismissive accounts of the drooling wackos and conspiracists (as they disdainfully regard them) who participate. Matt Welch of Reason was at the D.C. march yesterday and provides a different account from that you will surely read and see in the The New York Times and on network TV news.
Of the people I ended up talking to, the general vibe was that they were conservative, and then either Republican, formerly Republican, or independent. Every single one had unkind words to say about George W. Bush's spending and governing record, though none had protested him. None expressed trust in Republicans, and most preferred a "throw-all-the-bums-out" strategy. All but one did not care about Obama's birth certificate controversy, and those I asked thought it was foolish to bring guns to political gatherings.
UPDATE: It's also worth noting most of those who marched are employed and paid their own way to get to this shindig. It should be dawning by now on D.C. and state capital apparatchiks they have a serious problem on their hands: a revolt by the middle class, the largest class by far in this country and big government's meal ticket.

They're Not Who They'll Say They Are

As the Tea Party/Don't Tread on Me revolt grows we can count on the media churning out dismissive accounts of the drooling wackos and conspiracists (as they disdainfully regard them) who participate. Matt Welch of Reason was at the D.C. march yesterday and provides a different account from that you will surely read and see in the The New York Times and on network TV news.
Of the people I ended up talking to, the general vibe was that they were conservative, and then either Republican, formerly Republican, or independent. Every single one had unkind words to say about George W. Bush's spending and governing record, though none had protested him. None expressed trust in Republicans, and most preferred a "throw-all-the-bums-out" strategy. All but one did not care about Obama's birth certificate controversy, and those I asked thought it was foolish to bring guns to political gatherings.
UPDATE: It's also worth noting most of those who marched are employed and paid their own way to get to this shindig. It should be dawning by now on D.C. and state capital apparatchiks they have a serious problem on their hands: a revolt by the middle class, the largest class by far in this country and big government's meal ticket.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

The Fruits of Their Labor

It must be the belief on the left that heaping abuse on opponents will somehow win them over. Today we see the results of that peculiar strategy:

Up to two million people marched to the U.S. Capitol today, carrying signs with slogans such as "Obamacare makes me sick" as they protested the president's health care plan and what they say is out-of-control spending.

The line of protesters spread across Pennsylvania Avenue for blocks, all the way to the capitol, according to the Washington Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency.

People were chanting "enough, enough" and "We the People." Others yelled "You lie, you lie!" and "Pelosi has to go," referring to California congresswoman Nancy Pelosi.

Demonstrators waved U.S. flags and held signs reading "Go Green Recycle Congress" and "I'm Not Your ATM." Men wore colonial costumes as they listened to speakers who warned of "judgment day" - Election Day 2010.

The article notes that one (1) person carried a poster of the President with a mustache added to make him look like Hitler. Deplorable to be sure but by now old hat. A fresher and more effective approach would be to alter pictures of the President to make him look like Fidel or Hugo Chavez; the left would be hard-pressed explaining why that is insulting. The image below should also give them conniptions.


Thanks to Capitalist Coffee for images.)

The Fruits of Their Labor

It must be the belief on the left that heaping abuse on opponents will somehow win them over. Today we see the results of that peculiar strategy:

Up to two million people marched to the U.S. Capitol today, carrying signs with slogans such as "Obamacare makes me sick" as they protested the president's health care plan and what they say is out-of-control spending.

The line of protesters spread across Pennsylvania Avenue for blocks, all the way to the capitol, according to the Washington Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency.

People were chanting "enough, enough" and "We the People." Others yelled "You lie, you lie!" and "Pelosi has to go," referring to California congresswoman Nancy Pelosi.

Demonstrators waved U.S. flags and held signs reading "Go Green Recycle Congress" and "I'm Not Your ATM." Men wore colonial costumes as they listened to speakers who warned of "judgment day" - Election Day 2010.

The article notes that one (1) person carried a poster of the President with a mustache added to make him look like Hitler. Deplorable to be sure but by now old hat. A fresher and more effective approach would be to alter pictures of the President to make him look like Fidel or Hugo Chavez; the left would be hard-pressed explaining why that is insulting. The image below should also give them conniptions.


Thanks to Capitalist Coffee for images.)

Friday, September 11, 2009

Fear Be Gone!

Gray skies are gonna clear up,
Put on a happy face;
Brush off the clouds and cheer up,
Put on a happy face.
Take off the gloomy mask of tragedy,
It's not your style;
You'll look so good that you'll be glad
Ya' decide to smile!


The New York Times has a piece today on the fears that gripped New Yorkers in the aftermath of the 9/11 attack; fears that
New York would become a fortress city, choked by apprehension and resignation, forever patrolled by soldiers and submarines. Another attack was coming. And soon.
Miracle of miracles, it didn't happen and the Times reporter gives us heartwarming vignettes of feisty New Yorkers who overcame those fears. Nowhere, however, in this feel-good Hallmark card is there an explanation just why none of those fears came to pass, nor of any actions taken that may have obviated them. Nope, in this story the gut-wrenching dread we all shared just one day went poof! and disappeared thanks to the grit and optimism of us plucky New Yorkers. If, by any chance, you suspect our armed forces just might have had at least something to do with those vanished fears, look no further than the quote you read above for any reference to them. That's all there is.

In defense of the Times, it should be remembered who the commander-in-chief was that terrible day eight years ago. The Times could hardly be expected to mar a solemn day of remembrance by bringing up that name nor any of those in his charge; much better and safer to take all the credit for ourselves.

(h/t Instapundit.)

Fear Be Gone!

Gray skies are gonna clear up,
Put on a happy face;
Brush off the clouds and cheer up,
Put on a happy face.
Take off the gloomy mask of tragedy,
It's not your style;
You'll look so good that you'll be glad
Ya' decide to smile!


The New York Times has a piece today on the fears that gripped New Yorkers in the aftermath of the 9/11 attack; fears that
New York would become a fortress city, choked by apprehension and resignation, forever patrolled by soldiers and submarines. Another attack was coming. And soon.
Miracle of miracles, it didn't happen and the Times reporter gives us heartwarming vignettes of feisty New Yorkers who overcame those fears. Nowhere, however, in this feel-good Hallmark card is there an explanation just why none of those fears came to pass, nor of any actions taken that may have obviated them. Nope, in this story the gut-wrenching dread we all shared just one day went poof! and disappeared thanks to the grit and optimism of us plucky New Yorkers. If, by any chance, you suspect our armed forces just might have had at least something to do with those vanished fears, look no further than the quote you read above for any reference to them. That's all there is.

In defense of the Times, it should be remembered who the commander-in-chief was that terrible day eight years ago. The Times could hardly be expected to mar a solemn day of remembrance by bringing up that name nor any of those in his charge; much better and safer to take all the credit for ourselves.

(h/t Instapundit.)

In Atonement for the Previous Posting

In Atonement for the Previous Posting

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Just How Bad Can Contemporary Catholic Worship Be?

This bad. (Scenes from a mass at an assisted living facility for aging post-conciliarists.)



(Thanks, I think, to Banished Child of Eve.)

Just How Bad Can Contemporary Catholic Worship Be?

This bad. (Scenes from a mass at an assisted living facility for aging post-conciliarists.)



(Thanks, I think, to Banished Child of Eve.)

Warm Thoughts

Instapundit links to an interesting piece by Alan Boyle, a worthy science reporter, on the blight responsible the Irish potato famine 140 years ago. Apparently the parasite that caused it (Phytophtora infestans) is with us to this day and still wreaking havoc. The article also states the problem "may be exacerbated by global warming."

Which raises a question: given that the earth has gone through warming and cooling cycles throughout her history and still seems reasonably intact, isn't it possible that along with the many bad things associated with global warming there may be good things too? If so, why don't we hear about them?

Warm Thoughts

Instapundit links to an interesting piece by Alan Boyle, a worthy science reporter, on the blight responsible the Irish potato famine 140 years ago. Apparently the parasite that caused it (Phytophtora infestans) is with us to this day and still wreaking havoc. The article also states the problem "may be exacerbated by global warming."

Which raises a question: given that the earth has gone through warming and cooling cycles throughout her history and still seems reasonably intact, isn't it possible that along with the many bad things associated with global warming there may be good things too? If so, why don't we hear about them?

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

Whew!

To my great relief the speech given by the President tonight was not what I feared it might be: a statesmanlike appeal to members of both parties to get his health insurance scheme passed. The President didn't disappoint me though and instead gave a partisan, bordering on strident, broadside against the majority in this country who oppose his trillion dollar socialist fantasy, thus dashing any chance it will pass.

Whew!

To my great relief the speech given by the President tonight was not what I feared it might be: a statesmanlike appeal to members of both parties to get his health insurance scheme passed. The President didn't disappoint me though and instead gave a partisan, bordering on strident, broadside against the majority in this country who oppose his trillion dollar socialist fantasy, thus dashing any chance it will pass.

Wise Augustine

From a review in Zocalo Public Square of Before the Big Bang: The Prehistory of Our Universe by Brian Clegg:
But according to Clegg, the greatest problem with the Big Bang theory isn’t with the particulars, but rather with the fundamental (and universal, if you will) element of time. After cautioning that thinking about time “tends to twist the mind into pretzel form,” Clegg asks a perplexing question that resonates in the title: what came before the Big Bang? Here, supporters of the Big Bang theory come up empty-handed, and Clegg hints that a non-astrophysicist may know best. In his Confessions, ancient Greek philosopher St. Augustine proposed that before creation, there was no time as we know it, “no past and no future” but simply “always the present.”

Wise Augustine

From a review in Zocalo Public Square of Before the Big Bang: The Prehistory of Our Universe by Brian Clegg:
But according to Clegg, the greatest problem with the Big Bang theory isn’t with the particulars, but rather with the fundamental (and universal, if you will) element of time. After cautioning that thinking about time “tends to twist the mind into pretzel form,” Clegg asks a perplexing question that resonates in the title: what came before the Big Bang? Here, supporters of the Big Bang theory come up empty-handed, and Clegg hints that a non-astrophysicist may know best. In his Confessions, ancient Greek philosopher St. Augustine proposed that before creation, there was no time as we know it, “no past and no future” but simply “always the present.”

Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Remembering Billie Boggs

Fellow blogger Robbo, who lives in a D.C. suburb, reports the corpse of a man surrounded by empty beer cans was found recently in a tent the fellow lived in, in woods behind Robbo's house. There's no telling the particulars but odds are, like so many homeless, the man was mentally ill, schizophrenic probably, and downed vast quantities of alcohol in order to still the voices he heard in his deeply troubled mind. Robbo notes in an earlier time poor souls like this would have been locked up for their own and society's good but beginning in the Carter administration, in the name of "civil liberties," were turned loose, just as whacked out as before but "free" now to do whatever they wished.

The problem of the homeless in New York City, after the mental hospitals had been closed, exploded in the 1980s to the point where they were found on nearly every block in midtown and in large encampments in the parks (I'll never forget walking along the West Drive in Central Park one afternoon and catching site in one such encampment, on a stretch of lawn along Central Park South, the naked backside of a 300-plus pound woman as she took a copious dump on the grass). Then-Mayor Ed Koch finally had enough and ordered the police to round up the most incapacitated homeless and haul them to Bellevue Hospital where a special facility had been set up for them.

One of those rounded up, going by the name of Billie Boggs, was particularly notorious, well known to all who frequented midtown. Camped atop a heating vent on a sidewalk near Grand Central Terminal, she would shriek obscenities at passers by and if at hand, would hurl dog feces at them. While at Bellevue Boggs, who possessed considerable intelligence, contacted the New York Civil Liberties Union who took up her case. Owing to the expert handling of it by NYCLU director Norman Siegel, Billie Boggs was quickly made a cause célèbre among left-wing elites of New York City and became, as her case made its way through the courts, an eloquent spokeswoman (the drugs they treated her with at Bellevue having had their effect) for the civil "rights" of the mentally ill. Billie appeared on the Phil Donahue show and in perhaps her greatest triumph, gave a well-received lecture at the Harvard Law School. At a press conference Norman Siegel asked rhetorically, in classic PoMo relativistic fashion, if it were even possible to distinguish between the mentally ill and those pursuing"a vigorous alternative lifestyle." Billie won her case and was set free amid a shower of publicity and press.

Two weeks after giving her address at Harvard, Billie was seen back at her perch on the heating grate, dirty and disheveled, screaming obscenities and flinging turds at people. A couple of weeks later she was arrested for brawling. She drifted in and out of the courts and was seen for a while on various street corners on the East Side, in varying states of disrepair, then vanished, both from the public and the public's mind. Nobody from the Harvard Law School went looking for her, nor did Norman Siegel or anyone else from the New York Civil Liberties Union, or any of her other liberal "supporters." Billie Boggs, like Cynthia Sheehan so many years later, was no longer useful to her left-wing benefactors, indeed she had become a liability, so she was unceremoniously dropped and her former new friends moved on to the next great battle in the class struggle.

Remembering Billie Boggs

Fellow blogger Robbo, who lives in a D.C. suburb, reports the corpse of a man surrounded by empty beer cans was found recently in a tent the fellow lived in, in woods behind Robbo's house. There's no telling the particulars but odds are, like so many homeless, the man was mentally ill, schizophrenic probably, and downed vast quantities of alcohol in order to still the voices he heard in his deeply troubled mind. Robbo notes in an earlier time poor souls like this would have been locked up for their own and society's good but beginning in the Carter administration, in the name of "civil liberties," were turned loose, just as whacked out as before but "free" now to do whatever they wished.

The problem of the homeless in New York City, after the mental hospitals had been closed, exploded in the 1980s to the point where they were found on nearly every block in midtown and in large encampments in the parks (I'll never forget walking along the West Drive in Central Park one afternoon and catching site in one such encampment, on a stretch of lawn along Central Park South, the naked backside of a 300-plus pound woman as she took a copious dump on the grass). Then-Mayor Ed Koch finally had enough and ordered the police to round up the most incapacitated homeless and haul them to Bellevue Hospital where a special facility had been set up for them.

One of those rounded up, going by the name of Billie Boggs, was particularly notorious, well known to all who frequented midtown. Camped atop a heating vent on a sidewalk near Grand Central Terminal, she would shriek obscenities at passers by and if at hand, would hurl dog feces at them. While at Bellevue Boggs, who possessed considerable intelligence, contacted the New York Civil Liberties Union who took up her case. Owing to the expert handling of it by NYCLU director Norman Siegel, Billie Boggs was quickly made a cause célèbre among left-wing elites of New York City and became, as her case made its way through the courts, an eloquent spokeswoman (the drugs they treated her with at Bellevue having had their effect) for the civil "rights" of the mentally ill. Billie appeared on the Phil Donahue show and in perhaps her greatest triumph, gave a well-received lecture at the Harvard Law School. At a press conference Norman Siegel asked rhetorically, in classic PoMo relativistic fashion, if it were even possible to distinguish between the mentally ill and those pursuing"a vigorous alternative lifestyle." Billie won her case and was set free amid a shower of publicity and press.

Two weeks after giving her address at Harvard, Billie was seen back at her perch on the heating grate, dirty and disheveled, screaming obscenities and flinging turds at people. A couple of weeks later she was arrested for brawling. She drifted in and out of the courts and was seen for a while on various street corners on the East Side, in varying states of disrepair, then vanished, both from the public and the public's mind. Nobody from the Harvard Law School went looking for her, nor did Norman Siegel or anyone else from the New York Civil Liberties Union, or any of her other liberal "supporters." Billie Boggs, like Cynthia Sheehan so many years later, was no longer useful to her left-wing benefactors, indeed she had become a liability, so she was unceremoniously dropped and her former new friends moved on to the next great battle in the class struggle.

Sauce for the Gander

The national debt is about to push north of $12 trillion and by law the Senate must vote to okay it. Republicans Senators can and should--loudly--make political hay of it. They could do worse than by quoting the following:
Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren...America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.
Strong words indeed and time tested too; they served well in 2006 for former Senator Barack Obama on the Senate floor when he lambasted, before voting against, the Bush administration's motion to increase the deficit to the then towering figure of $9 trillion. The words should prove even more compelling the second time around.

Sauce for the Gander

The national debt is about to push north of $12 trillion and by law the Senate must vote to okay it. Republicans Senators can and should--loudly--make political hay of it. They could do worse than by quoting the following:
Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren...America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.
Strong words indeed and time tested too; they served well in 2006 for former Senator Barack Obama on the Senate floor when he lambasted, before voting against, the Bush administration's motion to increase the deficit to the then towering figure of $9 trillion. The words should prove even more compelling the second time around.

Saturday, September 05, 2009

A Modest Proposal...

From Damian Thompson (Telegraph, UK):
Perhaps I shouldn’t suggest this, but I wonder… wouldn’t it be a nice ecumenical gesture if, in return, we let the Episcopal Church have the Catholic “radical sisters” who have been pretending to be priests in American Catholic parishes for so long? Once they’re Anglicans, they can be nuns and priests at the same time. Think of the glorious opportunities for bossing people around!
I say let's not be pikers about this: for every Episcopal nun who popes, let's give back two make that three (with symbolic reference to the Trinity) of our rad Catholic sisters along with every guitar and tambourine we can dig up if we can somehow resist smashing them to smithereens. 

A Modest Proposal...

From Damian Thompson (Telegraph, UK):
Perhaps I shouldn’t suggest this, but I wonder… wouldn’t it be a nice ecumenical gesture if, in return, we let the Episcopal Church have the Catholic “radical sisters” who have been pretending to be priests in American Catholic parishes for so long? Once they’re Anglicans, they can be nuns and priests at the same time. Think of the glorious opportunities for bossing people around!
I say let's not be pikers about this: for every Episcopal nun who popes, let's give back two make that three (with symbolic reference to the Trinity) of our rad Catholic sisters along with every guitar and tambourine we can dig up if we can somehow resist smashing them to smithereens. 

Friday, September 04, 2009

Speaking of Imperious...



An interview with Congressman Pete Stark (D-CA): ignorance, arrogance, condescension and profanity from a little man with a lucrative sinecure (36 years and counting).

(Thanks to Instapundit)

Speaking of Imperious...



An interview with Congressman Pete Stark (D-CA): ignorance, arrogance, condescension and profanity from a little man with a lucrative sinecure (36 years and counting).

(Thanks to Instapundit)

Thursday, September 03, 2009

Too Many Trips to the Well

The Wall Street Journal in what looks like an obituary for ObamaCare:
A look back suggests the president and his allies may have "overlearned" the lessons of President Bill Clinton's 1993-1994 health-care defeat. They expended great effort to line up the support of health-care insurers, pharmaceutical makers and care providers, believing that by keeping them around the table, they could win over Republicans (emphasis added) and stop the kind of industry-led attacks that helped sink the Clinton plan. But this strategy left out the wooing of public opinion, which was being affected by broader events, including the economic crisis and anger over bank bailouts.
Here we see the folly of Administration and Congress believing opponents of socialized medicine are the cardboard-cutout stereotypes their college professors taught them they were; that all that was necessary was to bribe and threaten big pharma and insurance into submission and dim-witted lumpenproletariat conservatives, regarding it as nihil obstat, would meekly follow suit. What a delightful rude awakening then for Administration and Congress, most of whom have never had an honest job in their lives, to be angrily accosted by working stiffs deeply resentful of faux-aristocrats imperiously asserting authority over their welfare while simultaneously spending our republic into bankruptcy.

We need not need savor this moment however for there will be many more of them to enjoy in the months and years to come.

Too Many Trips to the Well

The Wall Street Journal in what looks like an obituary for ObamaCare:
A look back suggests the president and his allies may have "overlearned" the lessons of President Bill Clinton's 1993-1994 health-care defeat. They expended great effort to line up the support of health-care insurers, pharmaceutical makers and care providers, believing that by keeping them around the table, they could win over Republicans (emphasis added) and stop the kind of industry-led attacks that helped sink the Clinton plan. But this strategy left out the wooing of public opinion, which was being affected by broader events, including the economic crisis and anger over bank bailouts.
Here we see the folly of Administration and Congress believing opponents of socialized medicine are the cardboard-cutout stereotypes their college professors taught them they were; that all that was necessary was to bribe and threaten big pharma and insurance into submission and dim-witted lumpenproletariat conservatives, regarding it as nihil obstat, would meekly follow suit. What a delightful rude awakening then for Administration and Congress, most of whom have never had an honest job in their lives, to be angrily accosted by working stiffs deeply resentful of faux-aristocrats imperiously asserting authority over their welfare while simultaneously spending our republic into bankruptcy.

We need not need savor this moment however for there will be many more of them to enjoy in the months and years to come.

Metamorphosis



With its scintillating spread (with accompanying photo shoot) on Levi Johnston, the inarticulate but semi-photogenic fellow whose sole accomplishment thus far in life's journey has been the impregnation of Sarah Palin's daughter, Vanity Fair, ages ago a respectable journal, completes its transformation into Us Magazine for the chattering classes (who will devour the piece with alacrity). It is a publication no one needs now regard with the slightest seriousness nor, of course, its subscribers.

Metamorphosis



With its scintillating spread (with accompanying photo shoot) on Levi Johnston, the inarticulate but semi-photogenic fellow whose sole accomplishment thus far in life's journey has been the impregnation of Sarah Palin's daughter, Vanity Fair, ages ago a respectable journal, completes its transformation into Us Magazine for the chattering classes (who will devour the piece with alacrity). It is a publication no one needs now regard with the slightest seriousness nor, of course, its subscribers.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Professional Courtesy?

Scammers pumping out emails that try to trick recipients into parting with large sums of cash are getting a helping hand from the Democratic National Committee.

According to a researcher with anti-spam company Cloudmark, 419 fraudsters have been relaying a "significant" amount of messages through the democrats.org domain name. The abuse, which dates back at least to the beginning of this month, helps evade filters that internet service providers employ to block the messages.
What's especially insidious about this diabolical undertaking is the intentions of the licit and illicit messages are precisely the same.

(Thanks to Instapundit.)

Professional Courtesy?

Scammers pumping out emails that try to trick recipients into parting with large sums of cash are getting a helping hand from the Democratic National Committee.

According to a researcher with anti-spam company Cloudmark, 419 fraudsters have been relaying a "significant" amount of messages through the democrats.org domain name. The abuse, which dates back at least to the beginning of this month, helps evade filters that internet service providers employ to block the messages.
What's especially insidious about this diabolical undertaking is the intentions of the licit and illicit messages are precisely the same.

(Thanks to Instapundit.)

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Canterbury Sends Rome More of Her Best



The Society of All Saints' Sisters of the Poor, an order of Episcopal nuns near Baltimore, has after a long period discernment elected to be received, along with their chaplain Fr. Warren Tanghe, into the Holy Catholic Church on September 3rd. As a glance at the picture above will suggest, the sisters are a traditional order (I wonder if there is a single felt banner in their convent) and were, not surprisingly, having increasing difficulty reconciling their order to the ever-increasing heterodoxy of the Episcopal Church. From the (Baltimore) Catholic Review:
“We kept thinking we could help by being a witness for orthodoxy,” said Sister Mary Joan Walker, the community’s archivist.

Mother Christina said that effort “was not as helpful as we had hoped it would be.”

“People who did not know us looked at us as if we were in agreement with what had been going on (in the Episcopal Church),” she said. “By staying put and not doing anything, we were sending a message which was not correct.”
Those few remaining orthodox Episcopalians who still believe they might reverse their church's innovations of the past 30 years from within should note well the sisters' example, as well the following:
The sisters acknowledged it hasn’t been easy leaving the Episcopal Church, for which they expressed great affection. Some of their friends have been hurt by their pending departure, they said.

“Some feel we are abandoning the fight to maintain orthodoxy,” said Sister Emily Ann Lindsey. “We’re not. We’re doing it in another realm right now.”
Happily for the sisters they alone hold title to their considerable property so they should not have to face the greedy maw, in the form of lawsuits, from the Episcopal Church's Presiding Bishop Schori and her Consigliere Beers. Those who long for decent Catholic liturgy (especially hard to find in the Baltimore area I understand) should find the following especially heartening.
In addition to worshiping in the Latin rite, the sisters have received permission from the archbishop to attend Mass celebrated in the Anglican-use rite – a liturgy that adapts many of the prayers from the Episcopal tradition. Mother Christina said 10 archdiocesan priests, including Auxiliary Bishop Denis J. Madden, have stepped forward to learn how to celebrate the Anglican-use Mass.
The sisters' embrace of the full faith and sacraments of the Holy Catholic Church is sad news of course to the dwindling number of orthodox Episcopalians but joyful news to Catholics, especially traditionalists; the Anglicans posses a glorious worship tradition and Holy Church's considerable legacy would be enriched even further if it were subsumed by her.

Canterbury Sends Rome More of Her Best



The Society of All Saints' Sisters of the Poor, an order of Episcopal nuns near Baltimore, has after a long period discernment elected to be received, along with their chaplain Fr. Warren Tanghe, into the Holy Catholic Church on September 3rd. As a glance at the picture above will suggest, the sisters are a traditional order (I wonder if there is a single felt banner in their convent) and were, not surprisingly, having increasing difficulty reconciling their order to the ever-increasing heterodoxy of the Episcopal Church. From the (Baltimore) Catholic Review:
“We kept thinking we could help by being a witness for orthodoxy,” said Sister Mary Joan Walker, the community’s archivist.

Mother Christina said that effort “was not as helpful as we had hoped it would be.”

“People who did not know us looked at us as if we were in agreement with what had been going on (in the Episcopal Church),” she said. “By staying put and not doing anything, we were sending a message which was not correct.”
Those few remaining orthodox Episcopalians who still believe they might reverse their church's innovations of the past 30 years from within should note well the sisters' example, as well the following:
The sisters acknowledged it hasn’t been easy leaving the Episcopal Church, for which they expressed great affection. Some of their friends have been hurt by their pending departure, they said.

“Some feel we are abandoning the fight to maintain orthodoxy,” said Sister Emily Ann Lindsey. “We’re not. We’re doing it in another realm right now.”
Happily for the sisters they alone hold title to their considerable property so they should not have to face the greedy maw, in the form of lawsuits, from the Episcopal Church's Presiding Bishop Schori and her Consigliere Beers. Those who long for decent Catholic liturgy (especially hard to find in the Baltimore area I understand) should find the following especially heartening.
In addition to worshiping in the Latin rite, the sisters have received permission from the archbishop to attend Mass celebrated in the Anglican-use rite – a liturgy that adapts many of the prayers from the Episcopal tradition. Mother Christina said 10 archdiocesan priests, including Auxiliary Bishop Denis J. Madden, have stepped forward to learn how to celebrate the Anglican-use Mass.
The sisters' embrace of the full faith and sacraments of the Holy Catholic Church is sad news of course to the dwindling number of orthodox Episcopalians but joyful news to Catholics, especially traditionalists; the Anglicans posses a glorious worship tradition and Holy Church's considerable legacy would be enriched even further if it were subsumed by her.

Monday, August 24, 2009

Spotlight on Democracy

This past weekend your Bloviator took in the 123rd annual Delaware County Fair, something he's wanted to do for years but was unable to find the time until now. As luck would have it that very same day the New York State Legislature was holding a special session on the fairgrounds, presumably so constituents could have a close-up look at how democracy works in New York State. I managed to sneak some pictures and am pleased to share them with you.


Here we see the New York State Senate in the midst of vigorous debate over a bill under consideration. I was unable at first to learn the bill's contents but a source (who swore me to secrecy) did reveal the astonishing information it would require the imposition of higher taxes and fees from Albany.


The bill just passed! The contents are now clearly revealed and all that is needed is the signature of the Governor...


who was delayed, busy posing for a photo-op. Say "Cheese," Governor!


Nearby I ran into some of the the legislators' constituents, the good folks who year after year vote those hard-working denizens back into office.

All in all a most satisfying day seeing democracy in action.

Spotlight on Democracy

This past weekend your Bloviator took in the 123rd annual Delaware County Fair, something he's wanted to do for years but was unable to find the time until now. As luck would have it that very same day the New York State Legislature was holding a special session on the fairgrounds, presumably so constituents could have a close-up look at how democracy works in New York State. I managed to sneak some pictures and am pleased to share them with you.


Here we see the New York State Senate in the midst of vigorous debate over a bill under consideration. I was unable at first to learn the bill's contents but a source (who swore me to secrecy) did reveal the astonishing information it would require the imposition of higher taxes and fees from Albany.


The bill just passed! The contents are now clearly revealed and all that is needed is the signature of the Governor...


who was delayed, busy posing for a photo-op. Say "Cheese," Governor!


Nearby I ran into some of the the legislators' constituents, the good folks who year after year vote those hard-working denizens back into office.

All in all a most satisfying day seeing democracy in action.

Friday, August 21, 2009

This Time Stay There!

We all knew the lefties would drop Cynthia Sheehan, the anti-war protester, into the trash can when she was no longer useful to them. That they did but I never would have believed they would shove her back into it when she tried to crawl out.

This Time Stay There!

We all knew the lefties would drop Cynthia Sheehan, the anti-war protester, into the trash can when she was no longer useful to them. That they did but I never would have believed they would shove her back into it when she tried to crawl out.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

That Old-Time Religion

There is a rousing discussion taking place at Christopher Johnson's MCJ over just when the Episcopal Church began its downward spiral. Johnson reasonably suggests that the institution's refusal to charge Bishop Spong with heresy 30 years ago marked the beginning of the troubles. Commenters have suggested numerous other possibilities including the heresies of a predecessor of Spong's, Bishop Pike, who also got away with them. Other suggestions include the church's liberalization of rules concerning divorced persons remarrying; the ordination of women; the church's endorsement of birth control, beginning with the cautious endorsement years ago of the use of contraception in sharply specific circumstances and culminating in our time with the joyful celebration of abortion for any reason, any time. Professor Tighe obligingly notes the remarkable number of heretics entertained by the Episcopal Church over the years, blotting her escutcheon all the way back to the nineteenth century.

Ironically, one seemingly likely culprit for inclusion in the Episcopal rogues gallery, Gene Robinson, the adulterous attention-glomming Bishop of New Hampshire, merits only a brief mention in passing by Chris Johnson and by none of his commenters. I can't help thinking Robinson might feel snubbed by that (he does so exalt in being snubbed) but the astonishing fact is Robinson's theology, such as it is, is actually less appalling than those others mentioned above, which should give anyone not familiar with the Episcopal Church a fair idea what a dreadful state she is in these days.

I think the correct answer to the question who or what led to the demise of the Episcopal Church and most of mainstream protestantism is "all of the above and lots, lots more." Lacking strong central authority (or Magisterium, if you will) left most protestant denominations utterly defenseless to assaults from the radical proponents of 1960s "counter-culture" who successfully completed their takeover of most of those institutions, including the Episcopal Church, by the end of the 1970s.

Bishop Spong repeatedly claimed his church "must change or die" if the "reforms" he flogged were not enacted. They were enacted and his church continues to die. Meanwhile, the Catholic Church, which had a mighty close call with the counter-culture, suffering egregious damage,has nevertheless managed to hold the line in her moral teachings and theology (let us all pray for the repose of the soul of that unsung hero Pope Paul VI and give thanks for his brave stance in Humanae Vitae). After a steep decline in membership during those wretched years of folk masses and crappy liturgy, not to mention the unspeakable scandal of rapist priests and their protectors, the tide has turned for the Catholic Church, thanks in large part to our present Pope who is slowly making repairs and stressing traditional teachings and worship. What a surprise: membership is on the rise again and, even more heartening, so are vocations.

That Old-Time Religion

There is a rousing discussion taking place at Christopher Johnson's MCJ over just when the Episcopal Church began its downward spiral. Johnson reasonably suggests that the institution's refusal to charge Bishop Spong with heresy 30 years ago marked the beginning of the troubles. Commenters have suggested numerous other possibilities including the heresies of a predecessor of Spong's, Bishop Pike, who also got away with them. Other suggestions include the church's liberalization of rules concerning divorced persons remarrying; the ordination of women; the church's endorsement of birth control, beginning with the cautious endorsement years ago of the use of contraception in sharply specific circumstances and culminating in our time with the joyful celebration of abortion for any reason, any time. Professor Tighe obligingly notes the remarkable number of heretics entertained by the Episcopal Church over the years, blotting her escutcheon all the way back to the nineteenth century.

Ironically, one seemingly likely culprit for inclusion in the Episcopal rogues gallery, Gene Robinson, the adulterous attention-glomming Bishop of New Hampshire, merits only a brief mention in passing by Chris Johnson and by none of his commenters. I can't help thinking Robinson might feel snubbed by that (he does so exalt in being snubbed) but the astonishing fact is Robinson's theology, such as it is, is actually less appalling than those others mentioned above, which should give anyone not familiar with the Episcopal Church a fair idea what a dreadful state she is in these days.

I think the correct answer to the question who or what led to the demise of the Episcopal Church and most of mainstream protestantism is "all of the above and lots, lots more." Lacking strong central authority (or Magisterium, if you will) left most protestant denominations utterly defenseless to assaults from the radical proponents of 1960s "counter-culture" who successfully completed their takeover of most of those institutions, including the Episcopal Church, by the end of the 1970s.

Bishop Spong repeatedly claimed his church "must change or die" if the "reforms" he flogged were not enacted. They were enacted and his church continues to die. Meanwhile, the Catholic Church, which had a mighty close call with the counter-culture, suffering egregious damage,has nevertheless managed to hold the line in her moral teachings and theology (let us all pray for the repose of the soul of that unsung hero Pope Paul VI and give thanks for his brave stance in Humanae Vitae). After a steep decline in membership during those wretched years of folk masses and crappy liturgy, not to mention the unspeakable scandal of rapist priests and their protectors, the tide has turned for the Catholic Church, thanks in large part to our present Pope who is slowly making repairs and stressing traditional teachings and worship. What a surprise: membership is on the rise again and, even more heartening, so are vocations.

Saturday, August 15, 2009

Cry the Beloved Country

Ms. Sara Robinson, sedulous but perky chronicler of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy for the distinguished Campaign for America's Future blog, has been worried sick about the insidious fascistic movement in our country. Plucky optimist she is, however, she has up to now preached caution to her devoted followers.
All through the dark years of the Bush Administration, progressives watched in horror as Constitutional protections vanished, nativist rhetoric ratcheted up, hate speech turned into intimidation and violence, and the president of the United States seized for himself powers only demanded by history's worst dictators. With each new outrage, the small handful of us who'd made ourselves experts on right-wing culture and politics would hear once again from worried readers: Is this it? Have we finally become a fascist state? Are we there yet?

And every time this question got asked, people like Chip Berlet and Dave Neiwert and Fred Clarkson and yours truly would look up from our maps like a parent on a long drive, and smile a wan smile of reassurance. "Wellll...we're on a bad road, and if we don't change course, we could end up there soon enough. But there's also still plenty of time and opportunity to turn back. Watch, but don't worry. As bad as this looks: no -- we are not there yet."
Alas for America, Ms. Robinson has wiped that wan smile of reassurance from her face. Having grimly trained her gimlet eye on the nascent "teabag" (sic) movement and the resultant unpleasantness where jack-booted seniors and people who work for a living brutally assault, with harsh words and raised voices at "town hall" meetings, dedicated members of our Congress as they heroically but vainly assure them hard-working public servants in Washington D.C. know what is best for them when it comes to health care, Ms. Robinson declares now fascism has arrived, albeit lightening her tragic pronouncement somewhat by continuing the virtuoso display of her powerful gift for metaphor.
It's odd that I haven't been asked for quite a while; but if you asked me today, I'd tell you that if we're not there right now, we've certainly taken that last turn into the parking lot and are now looking for a space. Either way, our fascist American future now looms very large in the front windshield -- and those of us who value American democracy need to understand how we got here, what's changing now, and what's at stake in the very near future if these people are allowed to win -- or even hold their ground.
All is not lost, however. The saintly Ms. Robinson has promised us she will reveal in her very next post how our republic may be rescued from the evil forces looming in the collective, bug-splattered windshield. Bless her selfless soul.

Cry the Beloved Country

Ms. Sara Robinson, sedulous but perky chronicler of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy for the distinguished Campaign for America's Future blog, has been worried sick about the insidious fascistic movement in our country. Plucky optimist she is, however, she has up to now preached caution to her devoted followers.
All through the dark years of the Bush Administration, progressives watched in horror as Constitutional protections vanished, nativist rhetoric ratcheted up, hate speech turned into intimidation and violence, and the president of the United States seized for himself powers only demanded by history's worst dictators. With each new outrage, the small handful of us who'd made ourselves experts on right-wing culture and politics would hear once again from worried readers: Is this it? Have we finally become a fascist state? Are we there yet?

And every time this question got asked, people like Chip Berlet and Dave Neiwert and Fred Clarkson and yours truly would look up from our maps like a parent on a long drive, and smile a wan smile of reassurance. "Wellll...we're on a bad road, and if we don't change course, we could end up there soon enough. But there's also still plenty of time and opportunity to turn back. Watch, but don't worry. As bad as this looks: no -- we are not there yet."
Alas for America, Ms. Robinson has wiped that wan smile of reassurance from her face. Having grimly trained her gimlet eye on the nascent "teabag" (sic) movement and the resultant unpleasantness where jack-booted seniors and people who work for a living brutally assault, with harsh words and raised voices at "town hall" meetings, dedicated members of our Congress as they heroically but vainly assure them hard-working public servants in Washington D.C. know what is best for them when it comes to health care, Ms. Robinson declares now fascism has arrived, albeit lightening her tragic pronouncement somewhat by continuing the virtuoso display of her powerful gift for metaphor.
It's odd that I haven't been asked for quite a while; but if you asked me today, I'd tell you that if we're not there right now, we've certainly taken that last turn into the parking lot and are now looking for a space. Either way, our fascist American future now looms very large in the front windshield -- and those of us who value American democracy need to understand how we got here, what's changing now, and what's at stake in the very near future if these people are allowed to win -- or even hold their ground.
All is not lost, however. The saintly Ms. Robinson has promised us she will reveal in her very next post how our republic may be rescued from the evil forces looming in the collective, bug-splattered windshield. Bless her selfless soul.

Thursday, August 06, 2009

All In

President Obama, via the Democratic National Committee, is urging supporters of national health insurance to fight back against those opposed to it, accusing those opponents (ironically) of being part of an "astroturf campaign;" of being shills for the insurance companies and branding them "mobs" and "right-wing extremists."

The President is taking a considerable gamble. If his pet program crashes and burns (and as support for it seems to be dropping daily that seems an increasing possibility), his credibility will be shot. Launching a harsh, name-calling campaign against "extremists," only to lose to them because they turn out to be a substantial and now alienated majority, could render the President a politically spent force and, possibly, a lame duck before even the first year has passed in his presidency.

All In

President Obama, via the Democratic National Committee, is urging supporters of national health insurance to fight back against those opposed to it, accusing those opponents (ironically) of being part of an "astroturf campaign;" of being shills for the insurance companies and branding them "mobs" and "right-wing extremists."

The President is taking a considerable gamble. If his pet program crashes and burns (and as support for it seems to be dropping daily that seems an increasing possibility), his credibility will be shot. Launching a harsh, name-calling campaign against "extremists," only to lose to them because they turn out to be a substantial and now alienated majority, could render the President a politically spent force and, possibly, a lame duck before even the first year has passed in his presidency.

Tuesday, August 04, 2009

Saint's Day



The 150th anniversary of the death of St. Jean-Baptiste-Marie Vianney, Curé d'Ars. The patron saint of priests and inspiration to all of us not exactly scholars.

Saint's Day



The 150th anniversary of the death of St. Jean-Baptiste-Marie Vianney, Curé d'Ars. The patron saint of priests and inspiration to all of us not exactly scholars.

Monday, August 03, 2009

What We May Look Forward To

The bad news: In 2008, the State of Oregon Health Plan (government run) wouldn't pay for the pills this woman needed to keep her alive; too darned expensive.

The good news: the Plan was happy pay for the pills she would need to off herself; dirt cheap.

With the intention of nipping problems like this in the bud, the Plan also provides abortions at little or no cost.

What We May Look Forward To

The bad news: In 2008, the State of Oregon Health Plan (government run) wouldn't pay for the pills this woman needed to keep her alive; too darned expensive.

The good news: the Plan was happy pay for the pills she would need to off herself; dirt cheap.

With the intention of nipping problems like this in the bud, the Plan also provides abortions at little or no cost.