Thursday, May 24, 2007

No Apology Necessary


In the wake of the Pope's visit to Brazil come the usual complaints from self appointed "rights groups" his Holiness failed to make proper obeisance to a pillar of faith of the modern left: that Christianity was forced upon the hapless indigenous peoples by brutal, imperialistic missionaries. Not so, says the Pope: while there were regrettable excesses committed by some they do not negate the good and glory of the Church's evangelism in South America.

In our age it is hard to realize how seriously people took religion four hundred years ago. Catholic or Protestant, Christian belief was literally a matter of life and death to the faithful. It was not an uncommon occurrence during the reformation a simple farmer, for example, going willingly to the stake over matters many now would consider minor doctrinal issues. The missionaries in South America, who travelled and evangelized at considerable risk to themselves, also saw Christianity as a life and death issue, especially for the Indians. They sincerely believed if the indigenous heathen were not brought into the embrace of the Holy Church and their souls saved, they would be consigned to eternal damnation. The missionaries were not engaging in, to put it in lefty twaddle, imperialistic and cultural hegemony, rather they were following our Lord's injunctive to his disciples. No doubt some of them were a bit the mercenary along with missionary but the stupendous success of the Church's evangelization speaks not only to how effectively and zestfully her missionaries followed Christ's command but also to how eager their charges, the Indians, were to embrace the Good News delivered to them.

All in all, despite her many problems, the Church in Central and South America is in good repair, better than in Europe or even North America. Those courageous missionaries' efforts so many years ago are in a large way responsible. People with strong Christian beliefs are far more resistant to the enticements of paradise on earth the Marxist religion promises and that is the real reason for the lefty furor. While the Roman Catholic Church certainly has made mistakes in the past and should by all means address them whenever she can, there is no reason whatsoever for her to apologize to the so-called rights advocates whose true mission, despite all blather to the contrary, is establishing an atheistic collectivist dictatorship.

Update: Bro. James writes:

You might also want to consider the example of the North American Martyrs, whose feast is October 19. Twelve Jesuit priests from France were murdered by various Indian tribes in Quebec and upstate New York over the course of 40 years in the 17th century. Many of them were aristocrats; all had the equivalent of doctorates and some were poets of note. They competed against thousands of applicants in Europe to win the right to travel to the New World and preach to hostile savages who ended up killing 90 percent of them. The Iroquois chewed off St. Isaac Jogues' fingers so that he couldn't say Mass, then doused him with boiling water in a mockery of baptism and left him to die in the snow. He survived and was sent back to France, where he spent four years petitioning Rome for permission to return. Once he got back to Canada he went straight to the same village, where the savages tortured him for two full days. An Indian eyewitness who later converted testified that the tribesmen were so astonished at his bravery that they eviscerated him and fought one another to eat his heart after he was dead.

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Like I'm So Surprised . . .

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Christian, Jewish and Muslim leaders are urging President George W. Bush and Congress to take action against global warming, declaring that the changing climate is a "moral and spiritual issue."

Why do I suspect it wouldn't be a "moral and spiritual" issue if it didn't require the capitalist United States paying a heavy penalty for her crime of economic success?

(Snip)

"We are mobilizing a religious force that will persuade our legislators to take immediate action to curb greenhouse gases," it says.

Ever notice how the left loves to use "military speak," i.e. "mobilize" and "force?" It's got to be their repressed envy of real army men--which brings to mind this Tom Lehrer ditty.

(Snip)

Top officials from several mainline Christian denominations, including . . .

Hold it, hold it. See if you can guess which denominations--c'mon try! No? Need a hint? Okay, just one: they're all hemorrhaging membership. There you go! They are

the Episcopal Church, United Methodist Church, Presbyterian Church, African Methodist Episcopal Church and Alliance of Baptists also signed the letter, along with leaders of regional organizations and individual churches.

You would think these church "leaders," as they survey the emptying pews, might ask themselves whether their notion of "moral and spiritual issues" was at one with their fleeing parishioners but you would be wrong. Millennium Development Goals, anyone?

(Thanks to Bro. Rob)

Like I'm So Surprised . . .

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Christian, Jewish and Muslim leaders are urging President George W. Bush and Congress to take action against global warming, declaring that the changing climate is a "moral and spiritual issue."

Why do I suspect it wouldn't be a "moral and spiritual" issue if it didn't require the capitalist United States paying a heavy penalty for her crime of economic success?

(Snip)

"We are mobilizing a religious force that will persuade our legislators to take immediate action to curb greenhouse gases," it says.

Ever notice how the left loves to use "military speak," i.e. "mobilize" and "force?" It's got to be their repressed envy of real army men--which brings to mind this Tom Lehrer ditty.

(Snip)

Top officials from several mainline Christian denominations, including . . .

Hold it, hold it. See if you can guess which denominations--c'mon try! No? Need a hint? Okay, just one: they're all hemorrhaging membership. There you go! They are

the Episcopal Church, United Methodist Church, Presbyterian Church, African Methodist Episcopal Church and Alliance of Baptists also signed the letter, along with leaders of regional organizations and individual churches.

You would think these church "leaders," as they survey the emptying pews, might ask themselves whether their notion of "moral and spiritual issues" was at one with their fleeing parishioners but you would be wrong. Millennium Development Goals, anyone?

(Thanks to Bro. Rob)

Monday, May 21, 2007

We All Suffer Together

I suppose it's a small comfort that nearly every foolishness found in ECUSA these days has its equivalent in the Roman Catholic Church. A case in point is a group of alleged RC womyn, 'sixties veterans by their appearance, who go around calling themselves, preposterously, "Roman Catholic Womenpriests" (sic). It is well worth viewing their apologia on YouTube and while it is mildly depressing to see hippie gals of a more than certain age cavorting about playing priest, that is more than made up for by the spokesunit of this outfit whose didactic delivery had me howling and to whom even Al Gore would salute. Even more hilarious is the Roman Catholic Womenpriests' website which offers putative arguments for their legitimacy. Here is my favorite (but read them all, they're gems every one).

MYTH: These ordinations as women priests are not recognized or valid.
TRUTH: The group "RC Womenpriests" receives its authority from Roman Catholic bishops who stand in full Apostolic Succession. These bishops bestowed sacramentally valid ordinations on the women listed above. All the documents pertaining to these ordinations have been attested and notarized. All minutes of the ordinations, including data about persons, Apostolic Succession, and rituals, together with films and photos are deposited with a Notary Public.

May God have mercy on the souls of the bishops but never mind, friends: a genuine Notary Public has placed those precious documents in his safe, one with both a combination AND key lock. If that don't make them dames priests, well, there's always the Episcopal Church.

(Thanks to Diogenes)


We All Suffer Together

I suppose it's a small comfort that nearly every foolishness found in ECUSA these days has its equivalent in the Roman Catholic Church. A case in point is a group of alleged RC womyn, 'sixties veterans by their appearance, who go around calling themselves, preposterously, "Roman Catholic Womenpriests" (sic). It is well worth viewing their apologia on YouTube and while it is mildly depressing to see hippie gals of a more than certain age cavorting about playing priest, that is more than made up for by the spokesunit of this outfit whose didactic delivery had me howling and to whom even Al Gore would salute. Even more hilarious is the Roman Catholic Womenpriests' website which offers putative arguments for their legitimacy. Here is my favorite (but read them all, they're gems every one).

MYTH: These ordinations as women priests are not recognized or valid.
TRUTH: The group "RC Womenpriests" receives its authority from Roman Catholic bishops who stand in full Apostolic Succession. These bishops bestowed sacramentally valid ordinations on the women listed above. All the documents pertaining to these ordinations have been attested and notarized. All minutes of the ordinations, including data about persons, Apostolic Succession, and rituals, together with films and photos are deposited with a Notary Public.

May God have mercy on the souls of the bishops but never mind, friends: a genuine Notary Public has placed those precious documents in his safe, one with both a combination AND key lock. If that don't make them dames priests, well, there's always the Episcopal Church.

(Thanks to Diogenes)


Sunday, May 20, 2007

Another Trip for the Ferryman


Fr. Michael Seed, Charon of the Tiber for the quality, has done it again. This time his passenger is none other than soon-to-be Ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair. Seed is a remarkable fellow. After a truly horrendous childhood, he got religion and later found his way to the Roman Catholic Church, becoming something of the confessor to the stars, enjoying friendships with many of Britain's elite and bringing a fair number of them into the "fullness of the faith."

Your bloviator had the pleasure of meeting Fr. Seed a number of years ago when Seed, two old friends and I had a rollicking good time tucking into a fine repast at a decent restaurant in Manhattan. I got into friendly but spirited (in more ways than one) argument with him about Anglicanism. Quite the charmer he is and a brilliant debater: I seem to recall, as we parted and I staggered home, his prediction I, too, would one day swim the Tiber.

Another Trip for the Ferryman


Fr. Michael Seed, Charon of the Tiber for the quality, has done it again. This time his passenger is none other than soon-to-be Ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair. Seed is a remarkable fellow. After a truly horrendous childhood, he got religion and later found his way to the Roman Catholic Church, becoming something of the confessor to the stars, enjoying friendships with many of Britain's elite and bringing a fair number of them into the "fullness of the faith."

Your bloviator had the pleasure of meeting Fr. Seed a number of years ago when Seed, two old friends and I had a rollicking good time tucking into a fine repast at a decent restaurant in Manhattan. I got into friendly but spirited (in more ways than one) argument with him about Anglicanism. Quite the charmer he is and a brilliant debater: I seem to recall, as we parted and I staggered home, his prediction I, too, would one day swim the Tiber.

Friday, May 18, 2007

The Theology of Katharine Jefferts Schori

Courtesy of MCJ, KJS tells us all we need to know about her and her church:

"We permit remarriage after divorce, despite what Jesus said about it."

Yeah, those religious nuts can be such a pain in the ass.


(An old favorite, thanks to Revolution 21)

The Theology of Katharine Jefferts Schori

Courtesy of MCJ, KJS tells us all we need to know about her and her church:

"We permit remarriage after divorce, despite what Jesus said about it."

Yeah, those religious nuts can be such a pain in the ass.


(An old favorite, thanks to Revolution 21)

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Shipwreck

Update: Fr. Cantrell writes, "Check my blog for the statement, we're not taking on water..." (Glad to hear it, Father!) On it he has posted a press release from the Diocese of Fort Worth announcing the Diocese's plans for the future. It doesn't read nearly so dramatically as Ms. Gledhill's posting, rather it lists the various possibilities the diocese will consider. Nevertheless, it does seem as if Fort Worth and ECUSA will be parting company sooner or later. Also, I didn't mean to suggest the sound Diocese of Fort Worth was taking on water, it was ECUSA's seaworthiness I was questioning, given that Captain Ahab seems to be at her helm.

Ruth Gledhill, religion correspondent of the London Times, writes the Anglo-Catholic diocese of Fort Worth will be seeking alternative primal oversight from an African primate with the Diocese of Quincy (Illinois) and at least three other dioceses to follow.

And the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom. (Mk 15:38)

Shipwreck

Update: Fr. Cantrell writes, "Check my blog for the statement, we're not taking on water..." (Glad to hear it, Father!) On it he has posted a press release from the Diocese of Fort Worth announcing the Diocese's plans for the future. It doesn't read nearly so dramatically as Ms. Gledhill's posting, rather it lists the various possibilities the diocese will consider. Nevertheless, it does seem as if Fort Worth and ECUSA will be parting company sooner or later. Also, I didn't mean to suggest the sound Diocese of Fort Worth was taking on water, it was ECUSA's seaworthiness I was questioning, given that Captain Ahab seems to be at her helm.

Ruth Gledhill, religion correspondent of the London Times, writes the Anglo-Catholic diocese of Fort Worth will be seeking alternative primal oversight from an African primate with the Diocese of Quincy (Illinois) and at least three other dioceses to follow.

And the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom. (Mk 15:38)

He's Devastated, Just Devastated

From The Hill:
House Dems repudiate Pope’s abortion remarks

A group of House Democrats yesterday publicly repudiated the Pope’s recent suggestion that politicians who support abortion rights should be excommunicated from the Roman Catholic Church.

(snip)

The Democratic lawmakers said that the suggested penalty “offend[s] the very nature of the American experiment and do[es] a great disservice to the centuries of good work the church has done.”

Despite his sorrow over the House Democrats' action, the Pope later expressed his gratitude to them for their remarks regarding the "centuries of good work the church has done," acknowledging it was "mighty white of them to say so."

(h/t The Cafeteria is Closed)

He's Devastated, Just Devastated

From The Hill:
House Dems repudiate Pope’s abortion remarks

A group of House Democrats yesterday publicly repudiated the Pope’s recent suggestion that politicians who support abortion rights should be excommunicated from the Roman Catholic Church.

(snip)

The Democratic lawmakers said that the suggested penalty “offend[s] the very nature of the American experiment and do[es] a great disservice to the centuries of good work the church has done.”

Despite his sorrow over the House Democrats' action, the Pope later expressed his gratitude to them for their remarks regarding the "centuries of good work the church has done," acknowledging it was "mighty white of them to say so."

(h/t The Cafeteria is Closed)

Monday, May 14, 2007

It Depends on Who's Changing His Tune

Media idiotarians are all over Mitt Romney for changing his tune on abortion. I say bravo to him for at last recognizing abortion for what it truly is, infanticide. And if Romney was rather late in coming to his present view, let us be grateful he at least has finally done so.

When I was a foolish youth (is there any other kind?) I flirted with the trendy viewpoints and, for a time, supported abortion "rights." (The zeitgeist in the dreary 'seventies, the days of Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan and NOW, could easily overpower impressionable little minds like mine). As time went on and I responded slowly to Christ's bidding me back to His Church, I concomitantly divined (also slowly, I confess) life was God's greatest gift, thus the immorality and horror the depriving His gift from the innocent unborn. Many of us arrive at God's truths not via sudden epiphany rather through careful reasoning and revelation. Romney strikes me as a sincere man and I have no trouble believing that is how he arrived at the truth about abortion.

I wonder therefore why those media critics, so quick to pile on Romney, have been so strangely silent in the past when other prominent politicos have had a change of heart on abortion. Here are quotes from some of them. Can you identify the authors? The answers are below, along with the year the were made.

a) "Let me assure you that I share your belief that innocent human life must be protected, and I am committed to furthering this goal."

b) "I do not support any Constitutional Amendment pertaining to the legality of abortion."

c) "I am opposed to abortion and to government funding of abortions. We should not spend state funds on abortions because so many people believe abortion is wrong."

d) "What happens to the mind of a person, and the moral fabric of a nation, that accepts the aborting of the life of a baby without a pang of conscience? What kind of a person and what kind of a society will we have 20 years hence if life can be taken so casually? It is that question, the question of our attitude, our value system, and our mind-set with regard to the nature and worth of life itself that is the central question confronting mankind. Failure to answer that question affirmatively may leave us with a hell right here on earth."

e) "While the deep concern of a woman bearing an unwanted child merits consideration and sympathy, it is my personal feeling that the legalization of abortion on demand is not in accordance with the value which our civilization places on human life. Wanted or unwanted, I believe that human life, even at its earliest stages, has certain rights which must be recognized -- the right to be born, the right to love, the right to grown old."

Answers:

a) Al Gore, 1987

b) Dick Gephart, 1984

c) Bill Clinton, 1986

d) Jesse Jackson, 1977

e) Ted Kennedy, 1971 (Teddy was a Roman Catholic in those days.)

Funny, I don't recall any criticisms, any accusations of expediency, in the New York Times or Ms. when the blokes above revised their views on abortion.

(Thanks to Carolyn's Little World for the quotes.)

It Depends on Who's Changing His Tune

Media idiotarians are all over Mitt Romney for changing his tune on abortion. I say bravo to him for at last recognizing abortion for what it truly is, infanticide. And if Romney was rather late in coming to his present view, let us be grateful he at least has finally done so.

When I was a foolish youth (is there any other kind?) I flirted with the trendy viewpoints and, for a time, supported abortion "rights." (The zeitgeist in the dreary 'seventies, the days of Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan and NOW, could easily overpower impressionable little minds like mine). As time went on and I responded slowly to Christ's bidding me back to His Church, I concomitantly divined (also slowly, I confess) life was God's greatest gift, thus the immorality and horror the depriving His gift from the innocent unborn. Many of us arrive at God's truths not via sudden epiphany rather through careful reasoning and revelation. Romney strikes me as a sincere man and I have no trouble believing that is how he arrived at the truth about abortion.

I wonder therefore why those media critics, so quick to pile on Romney, have been so strangely silent in the past when other prominent politicos have had a change of heart on abortion. Here are quotes from some of them. Can you identify the authors? The answers are below, along with the year the were made.

a) "Let me assure you that I share your belief that innocent human life must be protected, and I am committed to furthering this goal."

b) "I do not support any Constitutional Amendment pertaining to the legality of abortion."

c) "I am opposed to abortion and to government funding of abortions. We should not spend state funds on abortions because so many people believe abortion is wrong."

d) "What happens to the mind of a person, and the moral fabric of a nation, that accepts the aborting of the life of a baby without a pang of conscience? What kind of a person and what kind of a society will we have 20 years hence if life can be taken so casually? It is that question, the question of our attitude, our value system, and our mind-set with regard to the nature and worth of life itself that is the central question confronting mankind. Failure to answer that question affirmatively may leave us with a hell right here on earth."

e) "While the deep concern of a woman bearing an unwanted child merits consideration and sympathy, it is my personal feeling that the legalization of abortion on demand is not in accordance with the value which our civilization places on human life. Wanted or unwanted, I believe that human life, even at its earliest stages, has certain rights which must be recognized -- the right to be born, the right to love, the right to grown old."

Answers:

a) Al Gore, 1987

b) Dick Gephart, 1984

c) Bill Clinton, 1986

d) Jesse Jackson, 1977

e) Ted Kennedy, 1971 (Teddy was a Roman Catholic in those days.)

Funny, I don't recall any criticisms, any accusations of expediency, in the New York Times or Ms. when the blokes above revised their views on abortion.

(Thanks to Carolyn's Little World for the quotes.)

Friday, May 11, 2007

Out of Beauty, Ugliness

Be assured the sacking of the temple is not confined to the Anglicans. Gerald Augustinus of The Cafeteria is Closed is touring Catholic churches in Europe and sending back damage reports with pics. Observe above a gorgeous Jesuit church in Austria, recently vandalized. It gets worse: cast your eyes to the right of the cofferdam-altar (which for sheer hideousness gives even this altar a run for the money) and survey the wondrous cross.


Yep, it's made of Lego blocks and sports ickle-wickle twuck. And just what does ickle-wickle twuck signify? Diogenes parodies the contempt-filled answer the poor bewildered sap may expect to receive from the perpetrators when asked, "Just what in the hell is this?"

Far from being blasphemous, the truck-cross is a recovery of one of the oldest and most venerable strands of orthodox Christian devotion. The 4th century Doctor of the Church Saint Hilary of Poitiers referred to Christ as "the vehicle of God" -- Dei currus -- since He transports fallen Mankind back to the Father through His redemptive act on the Cross. A well-known American Negro "spiritual" hymn speaks of the "sweet chariot" which is to carry the singer "home" to the bosom of the Father. Artist Liese Hochhuth used a toy truck in order to recapture the ancient image in a way meaningful to children -- and those not afraid to become as children -- in our own world of today.

Diogenes, of course, is employing the use of satire but in doing so he illustrates nicely what is really behind the impenetrable blather of progressives, both within and without the church: utter contempt for truth and beauty, notions progressives consider relics of the blinkered bourgeoisie, contrary to dialectics and a hindrance to the new order. And so it goes with them: to create the new society the old one must be destroyed and with it conventional perceptions. To get away with it, progressives insist what they are doing is noble; beautiful even, improving upon the original. Whether the masses believe it or not, as Diogenese points out, hardly matters. What does matter is the fostering of tension in the people over their old-fashioned views which will, over time and with constant repetition of the progressive platform, create such uncertainty in their minds they will no longer question, let alone express outrage over, the continuing transgressions against what they hold dear.

That, dear reader, is how the Episcopal Church in thirty short years got turned inside out as a Christian institution and will, in short order, cease to be one. The Catholic Church is similarly afflicted with progressives and they certainly have left their mark. Fortunately for Holy Mother Church, however, she has a pope: John Paul II managed to contain the damage and Benedict XVI actually seems to be reversing it. Let us pray it is so.

Let us also pray for the courage when lies are presented as truths, ugliness presented as beauty, to loudly, vigorously and vehemently protest it. That, as John Paul II showed the world so magnificently in Communist Poland, is how tyranny is eventually brought down.

Out of Beauty, Ugliness

Be assured the sacking of the temple is not confined to the Anglicans. Gerald Augustinus of The Cafeteria is Closed is touring Catholic churches in Europe and sending back damage reports with pics. Observe above a gorgeous Jesuit church in Austria, recently vandalized. It gets worse: cast your eyes to the right of the cofferdam-altar (which for sheer hideousness gives even this altar a run for the money) and survey the wondrous cross.


Yep, it's made of Lego blocks and sports ickle-wickle twuck. And just what does ickle-wickle twuck signify? Diogenes parodies the contempt-filled answer the poor bewildered sap may expect to receive from the perpetrators when asked, "Just what in the hell is this?"

Far from being blasphemous, the truck-cross is a recovery of one of the oldest and most venerable strands of orthodox Christian devotion. The 4th century Doctor of the Church Saint Hilary of Poitiers referred to Christ as "the vehicle of God" -- Dei currus -- since He transports fallen Mankind back to the Father through His redemptive act on the Cross. A well-known American Negro "spiritual" hymn speaks of the "sweet chariot" which is to carry the singer "home" to the bosom of the Father. Artist Liese Hochhuth used a toy truck in order to recapture the ancient image in a way meaningful to children -- and those not afraid to become as children -- in our own world of today.

Diogenes, of course, is employing the use of satire but in doing so he illustrates nicely what is really behind the impenetrable blather of progressives, both within and without the church: utter contempt for truth and beauty, notions progressives consider relics of the blinkered bourgeoisie, contrary to dialectics and a hindrance to the new order. And so it goes with them: to create the new society the old one must be destroyed and with it conventional perceptions. To get away with it, progressives insist what they are doing is noble; beautiful even, improving upon the original. Whether the masses believe it or not, as Diogenese points out, hardly matters. What does matter is the fostering of tension in the people over their old-fashioned views which will, over time and with constant repetition of the progressive platform, create such uncertainty in their minds they will no longer question, let alone express outrage over, the continuing transgressions against what they hold dear.

That, dear reader, is how the Episcopal Church in thirty short years got turned inside out as a Christian institution and will, in short order, cease to be one. The Catholic Church is similarly afflicted with progressives and they certainly have left their mark. Fortunately for Holy Mother Church, however, she has a pope: John Paul II managed to contain the damage and Benedict XVI actually seems to be reversing it. Let us pray it is so.

Let us also pray for the courage when lies are presented as truths, ugliness presented as beauty, to loudly, vigorously and vehemently protest it. That, as John Paul II showed the world so magnificently in Communist Poland, is how tyranny is eventually brought down.

Thursday, May 10, 2007

People, Can't We All Just Get Along?


Fight breaks out in audience of Boston Pops opening night concert

BOSTON -- Something else popped at the Boston Pops' opening night concert -- a brawl broke out at Symphony Hall.

Before rocker Ben Folds appeared as a special guest Wednesday night, two men did some rockin' and rollin' in the balcony as the orchestra performed a medley from the movie "Gigi."

I don't know what it is about show tunes and hip-hop but they just seem to bring out the worst in some people.

People, Can't We All Just Get Along?


Fight breaks out in audience of Boston Pops opening night concert

BOSTON -- Something else popped at the Boston Pops' opening night concert -- a brawl broke out at Symphony Hall.

Before rocker Ben Folds appeared as a special guest Wednesday night, two men did some rockin' and rollin' in the balcony as the orchestra performed a medley from the movie "Gigi."

I don't know what it is about show tunes and hip-hop but they just seem to bring out the worst in some people.

Rudy Clarifies His Stance on Abortion

Via Scrappleface:

(2007-05-10) - Rudy Giuliani this week plans to come out of the closet as the first openly pro-choice presidential candidate among leading Republicans, boldly making the case to conservatives that abortion “may be the GOP’s most effective electoral tool,” according to campaign insiders.

“Abortion disproportionately kills off blacks, the poor and those who live in metropolitan areas that are traditional Democrat strongholds,” said an unnamed Giuliani campaign source. “While pro-life Republicans hate to see anyone chopped up and yanked from the womb, knowing that it affects mostly liberals may make Rudy’s pro-choice stand more palatable.”
Fresh Swiftian logic like that will certainly liven up this upcoming campaign.

(Thanks to the Instapundit)

Rudy Clarifies His Stance on Abortion

Via Scrappleface:

(2007-05-10) - Rudy Giuliani this week plans to come out of the closet as the first openly pro-choice presidential candidate among leading Republicans, boldly making the case to conservatives that abortion “may be the GOP’s most effective electoral tool,” according to campaign insiders.

“Abortion disproportionately kills off blacks, the poor and those who live in metropolitan areas that are traditional Democrat strongholds,” said an unnamed Giuliani campaign source. “While pro-life Republicans hate to see anyone chopped up and yanked from the womb, knowing that it affects mostly liberals may make Rudy’s pro-choice stand more palatable.”
Fresh Swiftian logic like that will certainly liven up this upcoming campaign.

(Thanks to the Instapundit)

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

Reaching the Nadir

James E. McGreevey, the former governor of New Jersey who almost succeeded in further tarnishing the politicians of that state, has found a new calling. From the Newark Star Ledger (thanks to Bro. R):

"Former Gov. James E. McGreevey has started the process to become a priest in his newly adopted Episcopal faith and has been accepted into a three-year seminary program starting this fall . . .

He . . . has been accepted into the Master of Divinity program at Manhattan's renowned General Theological Seminary, seminary spokesman Bruce Parker said in a statement this afternoon.

"He has met all of General's admissions requirements and, as with all students accepted for admission, his application was evaluated by a committee composed of faculty members and several students, along with the Director of Admissions. We look forward to welcoming him as a member of the General Seminary community," Parker said.

"He has met all of General's admissions requirements . . ." Let's take a squint at this candidate's stellar resumé: He married a woman, sired a kid with her, then dumped her. He married another woman and sired another kid. All the while, as he thrillingly relates in his autobiography called, ironically, The Confession (but might better have been titled No Holes Barred), he was playing around with guys in romantic trysts in the finest restrooms throughout the Garden State, behavior he now confesses, with abject humility, was "a compromise." Then a teensy little problem arose: following 9/11 he procured for one of his paramours a six-figured government job as Homeland Security Advisor, a position for which his pal had zero qualifications and for which McGreevey got called out.

What to do? Bring out the heavy artillery. McGreevey fired and dumped his pal, called a press conference and with wife number 2 beside him, announced his resignation (delayed so to ensure his replacement would be a Democrat) and proclaimed to the citizenry of New Jersey he was a "gay American," i.e. a victim, and thus not to be blamed for his behavior. He then dumped wife number 2 (a nasty custody battle continues to this day) and found himself an Aussie with whom he lives for the present. Now James E. McGreevey has been accepted as a seminarian and hopes one day to administer the Body and Blood of Christ in His Holy Catholic Church.

What is terribly saddening about this sordid business is there are, astonishingly, young people of caliber and rectitude who still want to be priests in the Episcopal Church. What a slap in the face GTS's acceptance of this slimeball, this disgraced and unrepentant ex-governor of New Jersey, is to them. Poor ECUSA, she is beyond redemption. Weep for her.



Reaching the Nadir

James E. McGreevey, the former governor of New Jersey who almost succeeded in further tarnishing the politicians of that state, has found a new calling. From the Newark Star Ledger (thanks to Bro. R):

"Former Gov. James E. McGreevey has started the process to become a priest in his newly adopted Episcopal faith and has been accepted into a three-year seminary program starting this fall . . .

He . . . has been accepted into the Master of Divinity program at Manhattan's renowned General Theological Seminary, seminary spokesman Bruce Parker said in a statement this afternoon.

"He has met all of General's admissions requirements and, as with all students accepted for admission, his application was evaluated by a committee composed of faculty members and several students, along with the Director of Admissions. We look forward to welcoming him as a member of the General Seminary community," Parker said.

"He has met all of General's admissions requirements . . ." Let's take a squint at this candidate's stellar resumé: He married a woman, sired a kid with her, then dumped her. He married another woman and sired another kid. All the while, as he thrillingly relates in his autobiography called, ironically, The Confession (but might better have been titled No Holes Barred), he was playing around with guys in romantic trysts in the finest restrooms throughout the Garden State, behavior he now confesses, with abject humility, was "a compromise." Then a teensy little problem arose: following 9/11 he procured for one of his paramours a six-figured government job as Homeland Security Advisor, a position for which his pal had zero qualifications and for which McGreevey got called out.

What to do? Bring out the heavy artillery. McGreevey fired and dumped his pal, called a press conference and with wife number 2 beside him, announced his resignation (delayed so to ensure his replacement would be a Democrat) and proclaimed to the citizenry of New Jersey he was a "gay American," i.e. a victim, and thus not to be blamed for his behavior. He then dumped wife number 2 (a nasty custody battle continues to this day) and found himself an Aussie with whom he lives for the present. Now James E. McGreevey has been accepted as a seminarian and hopes one day to administer the Body and Blood of Christ in His Holy Catholic Church.

What is terribly saddening about this sordid business is there are, astonishingly, young people of caliber and rectitude who still want to be priests in the Episcopal Church. What a slap in the face GTS's acceptance of this slimeball, this disgraced and unrepentant ex-governor of New Jersey, is to them. Poor ECUSA, she is beyond redemption. Weep for her.



Tuesday, May 01, 2007

What Price Glory?


Remember this place, the Cathedral Church of Christ the King in Portage, Michigan? It was built in 1969 at a cost of $1.7 million. Today it was sold, 38 years later, for $1.3 million. If ECUSA's leadership is banking on their real estate portfolio making up for its declining membership, they might want to reconsider that strategy.

What Price Glory?


Remember this place, the Cathedral Church of Christ the King in Portage, Michigan? It was built in 1969 at a cost of $1.7 million. Today it was sold, 38 years later, for $1.3 million. If ECUSA's leadership is banking on their real estate portfolio making up for its declining membership, they might want to reconsider that strategy.

Uh, Can I Get a Refund on that Carbon Offset?

Have you noticed the Gaiaphiliacs make more and more reference to "climate change" as opposed to "global warming?" Just covering their bets, that's all; a sound strategy.

From Science Daily:


During the last 10,000 years climate has been seesawing between the North and South Atlantic Oceans. As revealed by findings presented by Quaternary scientists at Lund University, Sweden, cold periods in the north have corresponded to warmth in the south and vice verse. These results imply that Europe may face a slightly cooler future than predicted by IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.


h/t Riehl World View

Uh, Can I Get a Refund on that Carbon Offset?

Have you noticed the Gaiaphiliacs make more and more reference to "climate change" as opposed to "global warming?" Just covering their bets, that's all; a sound strategy.

From Science Daily:


During the last 10,000 years climate has been seesawing between the North and South Atlantic Oceans. As revealed by findings presented by Quaternary scientists at Lund University, Sweden, cold periods in the north have corresponded to warmth in the south and vice verse. These results imply that Europe may face a slightly cooler future than predicted by IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.


h/t Riehl World View

Friday, April 27, 2007

Newman's Own?



The worthy WannabeNewbie Anglican alerts us to an extraordinary comment on Fr. Dan Martin's blog, Confessions of a Carioca by someone who calls himself, encouragingly, Invicta Veritas. In it is a plausible hypothesis Anglo-Catholic bishops in ECUSA are on the verge of leading their flocks out of ECUSA, possibly to Rome; just rumors but Veritas writes with the air and confidence of someone who has well-placed connections. Particularly interesting is a meeting that took place last September between Archbishop Myers of the RC Diocese of Newark (he is also "Ecclesiastical Delegate" for the Anglican Use!) and the Anglo-Catholic Bishops Ackerman, Iker, Schofield and the recently poped +Herzog. Veritas provides some amazing details and it is well worth reading the whole thing. We must remember these are indeed mere rumors, they could well be spun from whole cloth, but should they be true there may be some remarkable developments in the near future.

I wonder if the bishops have concluded "Anglo-Catholic" is oxymoronic: that you can be one or the other but not both without making fatal compromises. John Henry Newman made that realization and took the swim 162 years years ago. There has been a fairly steady flow of Anglicans following him to Rome ever since. Will our Anglo-Catholic bishops cause the flow to become a torrent?

Reading about these rumors I must confess to the guilty and wicked pleasure of picturing Katharine Jefforts Schori, sitting at her polished desk in 850 Second Avenue, churning out yet another dreary propaganda piece for the United Nations while at the same time her Anglo-Catholic colleagues surreptitiously plan the spiritual equivalent of the Dunkirk evacuation. I know, it's impossible, just the product of a fervid imagination. Still . . .

Newman's Own?



The worthy WannabeNewbie Anglican alerts us to an extraordinary comment on Fr. Dan Martin's blog, Confessions of a Carioca by someone who calls himself, encouragingly, Invicta Veritas. In it is a plausible hypothesis Anglo-Catholic bishops in ECUSA are on the verge of leading their flocks out of ECUSA, possibly to Rome; just rumors but Veritas writes with the air and confidence of someone who has well-placed connections. Particularly interesting is a meeting that took place last September between Archbishop Myers of the RC Diocese of Newark (he is also "Ecclesiastical Delegate" for the Anglican Use!) and the Anglo-Catholic Bishops Ackerman, Iker, Schofield and the recently poped +Herzog. Veritas provides some amazing details and it is well worth reading the whole thing. We must remember these are indeed mere rumors, they could well be spun from whole cloth, but should they be true there may be some remarkable developments in the near future.

I wonder if the bishops have concluded "Anglo-Catholic" is oxymoronic: that you can be one or the other but not both without making fatal compromises. John Henry Newman made that realization and took the swim 162 years years ago. There has been a fairly steady flow of Anglicans following him to Rome ever since. Will our Anglo-Catholic bishops cause the flow to become a torrent?

Reading about these rumors I must confess to the guilty and wicked pleasure of picturing Katharine Jefforts Schori, sitting at her polished desk in 850 Second Avenue, churning out yet another dreary propaganda piece for the United Nations while at the same time her Anglo-Catholic colleagues surreptitiously plan the spiritual equivalent of the Dunkirk evacuation. I know, it's impossible, just the product of a fervid imagination. Still . . .

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

He Who Watches over Israel will Neither Slumber nor Sleep


Last week, a young student, totally insane but nevertheless free to roam a college campus because authorities lacked the legal means lock him up, blew away thirty-two of his classmates. The reaction from liberal idiotarians has been the usual call for sacking the Second Amendment, ignoring the fact Virginia Tech was already a "gun-free zone." It was a policy, as it turns out, that was almost a brilliant success: only one student on the huge campus was carrying heat that morning. No one among the intellectual elite in the academy or at the New York Times dared consider instead of stripping the Second Amendment rights of all citizens, curtailing the "rights" of the criminally insane, just a smidgen mind you, and how it might be more beneficial to society than riding herd on the Constitution.

That is not to say, however, that bold decisive action was not taken in the wake of the tragedy. A stellar example took place at (and how proud my late pappy and my grand pappy would be of their alma mater) Yale University. Let us doff our hats and stand at attention in admiration of one Betty Trachtenberg, Dean of Student Affairs, who upon hearing the horrible news from Virginia Tech, immediately banned the use of stage weapons in theatrical productions on campus. Dean Betty later eased her harsh decree by permitting the use of "obviously fake weapons," thus showing her boldness is tempered by reason. Evidently Yale takes seriously its obligation in loco parentis and young Elis must surely sleep easier at night knowing Dean Betty is watching over them.

He Who Watches over Israel will Neither Slumber nor Sleep


Last week, a young student, totally insane but nevertheless free to roam a college campus because authorities lacked the legal means lock him up, blew away thirty-two of his classmates. The reaction from liberal idiotarians has been the usual call for sacking the Second Amendment, ignoring the fact Virginia Tech was already a "gun-free zone." It was a policy, as it turns out, that was almost a brilliant success: only one student on the huge campus was carrying heat that morning. No one among the intellectual elite in the academy or at the New York Times dared consider instead of stripping the Second Amendment rights of all citizens, curtailing the "rights" of the criminally insane, just a smidgen mind you, and how it might be more beneficial to society than riding herd on the Constitution.

That is not to say, however, that bold decisive action was not taken in the wake of the tragedy. A stellar example took place at (and how proud my late pappy and my grand pappy would be of their alma mater) Yale University. Let us doff our hats and stand at attention in admiration of one Betty Trachtenberg, Dean of Student Affairs, who upon hearing the horrible news from Virginia Tech, immediately banned the use of stage weapons in theatrical productions on campus. Dean Betty later eased her harsh decree by permitting the use of "obviously fake weapons," thus showing her boldness is tempered by reason. Evidently Yale takes seriously its obligation in loco parentis and young Elis must surely sleep easier at night knowing Dean Betty is watching over them.

Real Men are Celibate

Via MCJ comes the depressing news fourteen African Anglican bishops, representing dioceses in Botswana, Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe, have affixed their names to a statement demanding the west remove economic sanctions on Zimbabwe, that pathetic relic of a once-prosperous country. While it comes as no surprise Kunonga, the bishop of Zimbabwe and Robert Mugabe's spiritual lapdog, signed it, it is sad beyond all words that so many others would do so as well, no doubt in reflexive anti-west reaction. If western nations really want to rid the world of Mugabe, they should bribe him, as much as it takes, to embrace and endorse the policies of the Bush administration: an invading neighboring army, financed by Cuba, will be marching triumphantly in the streets of Harare within six months.

Meanwhile, the Anglican bishops' Catholic counterparts in Zimbabwe are showing some mettle, holding prayer meetings to protest Mugabe's brutality. While the Anglicans, safe behind their borders, stand up for Mugabe, the Catholics are risking their very lives denouncing him. It seems the only clerics with balls in central Africa are celibates.

Real Men are Celibate

Via MCJ comes the depressing news fourteen African Anglican bishops, representing dioceses in Botswana, Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe, have affixed their names to a statement demanding the west remove economic sanctions on Zimbabwe, that pathetic relic of a once-prosperous country. While it comes as no surprise Kunonga, the bishop of Zimbabwe and Robert Mugabe's spiritual lapdog, signed it, it is sad beyond all words that so many others would do so as well, no doubt in reflexive anti-west reaction. If western nations really want to rid the world of Mugabe, they should bribe him, as much as it takes, to embrace and endorse the policies of the Bush administration: an invading neighboring army, financed by Cuba, will be marching triumphantly in the streets of Harare within six months.

Meanwhile, the Anglican bishops' Catholic counterparts in Zimbabwe are showing some mettle, holding prayer meetings to protest Mugabe's brutality. While the Anglicans, safe behind their borders, stand up for Mugabe, the Catholics are risking their very lives denouncing him. It seems the only clerics with balls in central Africa are celibates.

Thursday, April 19, 2007

It's a Religion of Peace, Part III

From the BBC:

Three people have been killed at a publishing house in Turkey that produced bibles, in an apparent attack on the country's Christian minority.

The victims were discovered at the Zirve publishing house in the eastern city of Malatya.

They were bound hand and foot and their throats had been slit, officials said.


Look for Muslim organizations to warn against potential "backlash" from this incident.

It's a Religion of Peace, Part III

From the BBC:

Three people have been killed at a publishing house in Turkey that produced bibles, in an apparent attack on the country's Christian minority.

The victims were discovered at the Zirve publishing house in the eastern city of Malatya.

They were bound hand and foot and their throats had been slit, officials said.


Look for Muslim organizations to warn against potential "backlash" from this incident.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Hedgemony



If you were wondering who buys the stupefyingly expensive wristwatches I wrote about below, Tom Wolfe trains his sights on "those people," hedge fund traders, here. If it were written by anyone else I would question the veracity the tales he relates but such is Wolfe's repute we must believe every horrifying detail. Here are a couple of them:

[T]he hedge fund founder desperate to get his son into one of Greenwich’s socially swell private schools who clips a six-figure check to the first page of the application, witlessly forcing the school to reject both his son and his check or lose all credibility—

The lone-wolf entrepreneur who keeps an old-money matron and charity fundraiser waiting outside his office in Greenwich for an hour, remains reared back in his chair with his feet propped up on top of his desk as she comes in, listens to her pitch with his feet on top of his desk, utters a sum total of two words, “Not interested,” with his feet up on top of his desk, and offers no farewell, not even a Godspeed tap-tap of the shoes on his feet up on top of the desk—


If you can stomach it, read it all. I grew up in that town; much different place in those days.

Hedgemony



If you were wondering who buys the stupefyingly expensive wristwatches I wrote about below, Tom Wolfe trains his sights on "those people," hedge fund traders, here. If it were written by anyone else I would question the veracity the tales he relates but such is Wolfe's repute we must believe every horrifying detail. Here are a couple of them:

[T]he hedge fund founder desperate to get his son into one of Greenwich’s socially swell private schools who clips a six-figure check to the first page of the application, witlessly forcing the school to reject both his son and his check or lose all credibility—

The lone-wolf entrepreneur who keeps an old-money matron and charity fundraiser waiting outside his office in Greenwich for an hour, remains reared back in his chair with his feet propped up on top of his desk as she comes in, listens to her pitch with his feet on top of his desk, utters a sum total of two words, “Not interested,” with his feet up on top of his desk, and offers no farewell, not even a Godspeed tap-tap of the shoes on his feet up on top of the desk—


If you can stomach it, read it all. I grew up in that town; much different place in those days.

Monday, April 16, 2007

Happy Birthday, New York Sun!



It's five years old today, despite many predictions of its quick demise. It is the best, the only, newspaper in New York and I've been reading it since day one. Yes, the New York Post is great fun but I would drop it in a minute were it not for the clever headlines and the Times of London crossword. The NewYork Times still shows atavistic flashes of its former greatness but the cancerous left-wing ideology of its spoiled brat, rich kid publisher/owner "Pinch" Sulzberger has metastasized throughout the the host (even the real estate, business and sports sections!) and simply is no longer worth the trouble.

It reminds me of another formerly great institution.

Happy Birthday, New York Sun!



It's five years old today, despite many predictions of its quick demise. It is the best, the only, newspaper in New York and I've been reading it since day one. Yes, the New York Post is great fun but I would drop it in a minute were it not for the clever headlines and the Times of London crossword. The NewYork Times still shows atavistic flashes of its former greatness but the cancerous left-wing ideology of its spoiled brat, rich kid publisher/owner "Pinch" Sulzberger has metastasized throughout the the host (even the real estate, business and sports sections!) and simply is no longer worth the trouble.

It reminds me of another formerly great institution.

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Autophagia



The bus I take every Sunday to the church where I worship also happens to pass by the Cathedral Church of Saint John the Divine. Lately I've noticed a great deal of activity on a large swath of its southern edge, suggesting a new building going up. Since the cathedral is still a long way from finished and is also looking decidedly run down these days, it didn't square with me the trustees would be adding yet another building to the considerable number already on the property. I checked the Cathedral website to see if there was an explanation. There was.

It seems the trustees are leasing out large portions of the property, the parcel I noticed on the south edge to a real estate investment trust and an even larger one on the north edge to Columbia University. There will be new buildings going up but they won't belong to the Cathedral and they'll have nothing to do with church. In short, the Cathedral is going broke and, in effect, the trustees are selling off the assets to pay the bills, something I suspect we'll be seeing a lot more of from ECUSA in the not-so-distant future.

Autophagia



The bus I take every Sunday to the church where I worship also happens to pass by the Cathedral Church of Saint John the Divine. Lately I've noticed a great deal of activity on a large swath of its southern edge, suggesting a new building going up. Since the cathedral is still a long way from finished and is also looking decidedly run down these days, it didn't square with me the trustees would be adding yet another building to the considerable number already on the property. I checked the Cathedral website to see if there was an explanation. There was.

It seems the trustees are leasing out large portions of the property, the parcel I noticed on the south edge to a real estate investment trust and an even larger one on the north edge to Columbia University. There will be new buildings going up but they won't belong to the Cathedral and they'll have nothing to do with church. In short, the Cathedral is going broke and, in effect, the trustees are selling off the assets to pay the bills, something I suspect we'll be seeing a lot more of from ECUSA in the not-so-distant future.

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Icons for the Self-Worshipper


$350,000...

Well, not exactly. The image above happens to be the likeness of the watch I wear on my wrist and for which I paid a cool $27 at Walmart. Until recently, I confess, I never paid it much mind, save when experiencing the mundane notion of wanting to know what time it is. A recent article in the Wall Street Journal's "Pursuits" section, however, has caused me to regard my little Timex with greatly increased respect.

The article was a lengthy spread on the latest whiz-bang watches emenating from Switzerland, along with a highly detailed index with recommendations to buy, hold or sell specific makes and models. The prices are most impressive, ranging from a paltry three grand for a couple of models, probably intended as stocking stuffers for the young progeny of hedge fund traders in Greenwich, all the way up to an $860,000 grown-up watch for daddy himself, the Blancpain 1775, which includes, among the many gadgets stuffed inside it, a "tourbillon," an essential feature that "counters the effects of gravity on a watch's accuracy." (That pesky gravity, glad someone's finally done something about it!)

Now, you may wonder, what does this gross excess have to do with my Timex watch? Just this: My humble little Timex, like any watch with a quartz movement, is a better timekeeper than any of the watches referred to above, which contain mechanical movements. What's more, all the bells, whistles and geegaws mechanical-movement watches contain not only raise their prices to stratospheric heights, but actually reduce their accuracy owing to the additional moving parts. Thus we're presented with a curious inverse proportion: the more a watch costs, the less accurate it is.

It is not so curious at all, however, when we consider the gazillionaires who lay out the bucks for these things are not buying timepieces at all, rather expensive jewelry, a male version of the diamond tiara, and meant to be seen and to impress. Not actually knowing anyone who owns one of these hideously expensive toys, I dare not attempt further characterization except to aver with a certain confidence they cannot possibly call themselves Christian: Nobody spending a half-million clams on a watch could possibly worship any entity other than himself.


Only $865,000 and nearly as accurate as a Timex!

Icons for the Self-Worshipper


$350,000...

Well, not exactly. The image above happens to be the likeness of the watch I wear on my wrist and for which I paid a cool $27 at Walmart. Until recently, I confess, I never paid it much mind, save when experiencing the mundane notion of wanting to know what time it is. A recent article in the Wall Street Journal's "Pursuits" section, however, has caused me to regard my little Timex with greatly increased respect.

The article was a lengthy spread on the latest whiz-bang watches emenating from Switzerland, along with a highly detailed index with recommendations to buy, hold or sell specific makes and models. The prices are most impressive, ranging from a paltry three grand for a couple of models, probably intended as stocking stuffers for the young progeny of hedge fund traders in Greenwich, all the way up to an $860,000 grown-up watch for daddy himself, the Blancpain 1775, which includes, among the many gadgets stuffed inside it, a "tourbillon," an essential feature that "counters the effects of gravity on a watch's accuracy." (That pesky gravity, glad someone's finally done something about it!)

Now, you may wonder, what does this gross excess have to do with my Timex watch? Just this: My humble little Timex, like any watch with a quartz movement, is a better timekeeper than any of the watches referred to above, which contain mechanical movements. What's more, all the bells, whistles and geegaws mechanical-movement watches contain not only raise their prices to stratospheric heights, but actually reduce their accuracy owing to the additional moving parts. Thus we're presented with a curious inverse proportion: the more a watch costs, the less accurate it is.

It is not so curious at all, however, when we consider the gazillionaires who lay out the bucks for these things are not buying timepieces at all, rather expensive jewelry, a male version of the diamond tiara, and meant to be seen and to impress. Not actually knowing anyone who owns one of these hideously expensive toys, I dare not attempt further characterization except to aver with a certain confidence they cannot possibly call themselves Christian: Nobody spending a half-million clams on a watch could possibly worship any entity other than himself.


Only $865,000 and nearly as accurate as a Timex!

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Quiet Entertainment for Holy Week



In this most solemn week if you still seek diversion and consider "The Sopranos" or "The Office" unsuitable, you could do far worse than the following:

Jesus of Nazareth: Franco Zefirelli, director.

This six-and-a-half hour, made-for-TV movie on the life of our Lord premiered to huge acclaim in 1977 and then pretty much disappeared. I watched that premier and for me there is no better cinematic retelling of the Gospels. Produced by Lew Grade, it has an unbelievable cast and was beautifully shot (it's Zefirelli, after all) on location. The only drawbacks are the DVD is made from an old and worn print with scratches and somewhat faded color. Also, while the sound quality is acceptable, it is only barely so. The virtues, however, far outweigh the flaws. Amazon has it, so does Netflix.

Bach: St. Matthew and St. John Passions; Phillippe Herreweghe, conductor.

There are zillions of recordings of the Bach Passions, many of them wonderful, but I think Herreweghe's are the best (he recorded the St. Matthew twice: they're both fine). Herreweghe is the only conductor I know who, while adhering to period performance practices, is not afraid to bend and shape a musical line like a romantic. It's as if Wilhelm Furtwängler were conducting an early music ensemble. This is some of the most glorious music ever written by the greatest composer of them all, whom God was kindly disposed to give to us, His beloved creatures.

Happy Easter.

Quiet Entertainment for Holy Week



In this most solemn week if you still seek diversion and consider "The Sopranos" or "The Office" unsuitable, you could do far worse than the following:

Jesus of Nazareth: Franco Zefirelli, director.

This six-and-a-half hour, made-for-TV movie on the life of our Lord premiered to huge acclaim in 1977 and then pretty much disappeared. I watched that premier and for me there is no better cinematic retelling of the Gospels. Produced by Lew Grade, it has an unbelievable cast and was beautifully shot (it's Zefirelli, after all) on location. The only drawbacks are the DVD is made from an old and worn print with scratches and somewhat faded color. Also, while the sound quality is acceptable, it is only barely so. The virtues, however, far outweigh the flaws. Amazon has it, so does Netflix.

Bach: St. Matthew and St. John Passions; Phillippe Herreweghe, conductor.

There are zillions of recordings of the Bach Passions, many of them wonderful, but I think Herreweghe's are the best (he recorded the St. Matthew twice: they're both fine). Herreweghe is the only conductor I know who, while adhering to period performance practices, is not afraid to bend and shape a musical line like a romantic. It's as if Wilhelm Furtwängler were conducting an early music ensemble. This is some of the most glorious music ever written by the greatest composer of them all, whom God was kindly disposed to give to us, His beloved creatures.

Happy Easter.

Monday, April 02, 2007

To the Victor Go the Spoils

Surveying the opinions of the revisionists recently, I noticed along with the usual ferocious broadsides issued against the evil, hate-filled orthodox for sowing discord and schism in "their" church, even more venomous words are directed at the primatial carpetbaggers hailing from those notorious imperialist powers, Nigeria, Uganda and Rwanda.

It is to be expected: Nothing enrages well-off white liberals more than differently-hued inferiors refusing to toe the line, stepping off the lefty plantation. This is an old story and transcends the current unpleasantness in the Episcopal Church. You have to wonder though if the revisionists are living in an alternate universe with their gleeful approbation of the House of Bishops' recent rejection of the "Primatial Vicar and Council" plan proposed by +Cantuar and the Primates. The purpose of this plan was to give conservative Episcopalians, disaffected by the increasing lunacy and apostasy of their church's leadership, a pointy hat of their own with whom they could talk. "No effing way," said the HOB (here's a typical pastoral letter; read one, you've read them all, boilerplate written by a committee of lawyers). To a number, the bishops justifying the rejection of the plan cite Holy Polity, which apparently is the ultimate authority in ECUSA and is, conveniently, ever-malleable for the nixing of distasteful proposals.

The revisionist bloggers are euphoric about the rejection, congratulating the bishops for the brave stance they've taken, for "pushing back" and refusing to let those mean old Negroes in Africa tell them what to do. Those of us in the orthodox camp saw the ABC's and Primates' plan as one last chance for ECUSA to pull back from the abyss lest she fall into it. The revisionists saw it as a devious colonialist cabal to yank their enlightened church back to the dark ways of its past and saw the bishops' rejection of it as a brilliant triumph. No wonder they're thrilled and it pretty much marks the end of the war for them, all that's left being the mopping up. The last remaining and dwefful diffy part comes this fall when "Uncle Rowan,"as one important progressive blogger refers to him, lets the cat out of the cellophane bag and announces ECUSA has officially walked apart from the Anglican Communion. ECUSA, with a delightfully playful sense of the paradoxical and absurd, will deny it of course and continue to play church, trotting out ever more new and improved WorshipProduct™ before her dwindling members, hoping to stem their declining number.

But it's over. ECUSA belongs to the progressives now and the orthodox are jumping ship. They cannot be stopped and the progressives' loving contempt for them will soon vanish. They will try to take away their property but even if they get the keys, the orthodox will leave. They will drag their bishops, priests and vestrymen into court but even with convictions or judgments, the orthodox will leave. They will shower them with invective, abuse, threats and damnation but even so and especially, the orthodox will leave. There is nothing the progressives can do to stop orthodox flight and going with them will be the young, the money, the commitment and the enthusiasm. The only growing churches in ECUSA these days are those leaving or soon to be. The progressives may rail about opportunistic African primates but are quite aware those bishops have only gone to where they have been invited. Their rants will fall on deaf ears. To the victor go the spoils but with ECUSA the spoils are spoliated. When the progressives make that nasty discovery, in the absence of orthodox scapegoats, they will turn on each other instead with a fury not yet seen in this sorry, but soon to be ending, saga.

To the Victor Go the Spoils

Surveying the opinions of the revisionists recently, I noticed along with the usual ferocious broadsides issued against the evil, hate-filled orthodox for sowing discord and schism in "their" church, even more venomous words are directed at the primatial carpetbaggers hailing from those notorious imperialist powers, Nigeria, Uganda and Rwanda.

It is to be expected: Nothing enrages well-off white liberals more than differently-hued inferiors refusing to toe the line, stepping off the lefty plantation. This is an old story and transcends the current unpleasantness in the Episcopal Church. You have to wonder though if the revisionists are living in an alternate universe with their gleeful approbation of the House of Bishops' recent rejection of the "Primatial Vicar and Council" plan proposed by +Cantuar and the Primates. The purpose of this plan was to give conservative Episcopalians, disaffected by the increasing lunacy and apostasy of their church's leadership, a pointy hat of their own with whom they could talk. "No effing way," said the HOB (here's a typical pastoral letter; read one, you've read them all, boilerplate written by a committee of lawyers). To a number, the bishops justifying the rejection of the plan cite Holy Polity, which apparently is the ultimate authority in ECUSA and is, conveniently, ever-malleable for the nixing of distasteful proposals.

The revisionist bloggers are euphoric about the rejection, congratulating the bishops for the brave stance they've taken, for "pushing back" and refusing to let those mean old Negroes in Africa tell them what to do. Those of us in the orthodox camp saw the ABC's and Primates' plan as one last chance for ECUSA to pull back from the abyss lest she fall into it. The revisionists saw it as a devious colonialist cabal to yank their enlightened church back to the dark ways of its past and saw the bishops' rejection of it as a brilliant triumph. No wonder they're thrilled and it pretty much marks the end of the war for them, all that's left being the mopping up. The last remaining and dwefful diffy part comes this fall when "Uncle Rowan,"as one important progressive blogger refers to him, lets the cat out of the cellophane bag and announces ECUSA has officially walked apart from the Anglican Communion. ECUSA, with a delightfully playful sense of the paradoxical and absurd, will deny it of course and continue to play church, trotting out ever more new and improved WorshipProduct™ before her dwindling members, hoping to stem their declining number.

But it's over. ECUSA belongs to the progressives now and the orthodox are jumping ship. They cannot be stopped and the progressives' loving contempt for them will soon vanish. They will try to take away their property but even if they get the keys, the orthodox will leave. They will drag their bishops, priests and vestrymen into court but even with convictions or judgments, the orthodox will leave. They will shower them with invective, abuse, threats and damnation but even so and especially, the orthodox will leave. There is nothing the progressives can do to stop orthodox flight and going with them will be the young, the money, the commitment and the enthusiasm. The only growing churches in ECUSA these days are those leaving or soon to be. The progressives may rail about opportunistic African primates but are quite aware those bishops have only gone to where they have been invited. Their rants will fall on deaf ears. To the victor go the spoils but with ECUSA the spoils are spoliated. When the progressives make that nasty discovery, in the absence of orthodox scapegoats, they will turn on each other instead with a fury not yet seen in this sorry, but soon to be ending, saga.

Worship the Lord In the Beauty of Cheesiness



Adam at Anglo-Catholic Ruminations is holding a "Chintzy Chasuble Contest" and is inviting submissions. He's posted several already (passim, keep scrolling down), one of which will be familiar to readers of this blog. But there must be many more ugly chasubles out there, after all, the New Religionists have been peddling their worship-product™ for well over over thirty years. If, in your Internet travels, you've ever had to avert your glance at an image of taste-free vestments, by all means send a pic or link to Adam so that it may be shared with all.

Worship the Lord In the Beauty of Cheesiness



Adam at Anglo-Catholic Ruminations is holding a "Chintzy Chasuble Contest" and is inviting submissions. He's posted several already (passim, keep scrolling down), one of which will be familiar to readers of this blog. But there must be many more ugly chasubles out there, after all, the New Religionists have been peddling their worship-product™ for well over over thirty years. If, in your Internet travels, you've ever had to avert your glance at an image of taste-free vestments, by all means send a pic or link to Adam so that it may be shared with all.